Agent skills are increasingly used to equip large language model (LLM) agents with reusable procedural knowledge. Although recent work has substantially improved skill retrieval due to the increasing skill libraries, retrieving a plausible skill bundle does not guarantee that executing it is worthwhile. Since every skill-conditioned rollout is computationally expensive, deciding whether a retrieved bundle should be executed has become an increasingly important challenge. To this end, we introduce the Reward-Aware Dynamic Execution Gate (RADEG), a lightweight, retriever-agnostic decision layer between skill retrieval and agent execution. RADEG learns a low-cost surrogate model that predicts the execution utility of a query--bundle pair before the expensive rollout is launched. To obtain informative supervision while controlling for task difficulty, we locally perturb each retrieved bundle by deleting, adding, or replacing one skill, producing matched same-query rollouts that isolate the effect of bundle composition on verifier reward. During deployment, RADEG updates only a warm-started logistic head as new verifier feedback becomes available, enabling inexpensive adaptation of the execute/skip boundary without retraining either the retriever or the agent. Under a query-level held-out evaluation on 288 collected rollouts, RADEG substantially reduces unnecessary agent executions while preserving a large fraction of the downstream verifier reward. It consistently outperforms relevance-based and random gating across different execution budgets, demonstrating that execution-aware surrogate modeling provides a practical and cost-effective complement to skill retrieval.
One-shot federated learning (OSFL) has emerged as a promising collaborative model learning framework with only a single round of communication, offering significant advantages in communication efficiency and privacy preservation. However, OSFL often faces inherent limitations under severe domain heterogeneity across clients due to the lack of iterative knowledge exchange. Most existing OSFL methods require an auxiliary public dataset for knowledge distillation or leverage statistical information for parameter-level aggregation, overlooking feature shift caused by domain heterogeneity. To address these challenges, we propose CRIP, a personalized OSFL framework that operates in the representation space via channel-level feature alignment. To achieve this, each client uploads its feature extractor to the server, which broadcasts all extractors back to every client. Since not all source clients share compatible feature distributions with the target client, indiscriminate fusion of cross-client features would introduce domain-specific noise. Therefore, CRIP effectively measures the channel-wise representational similarity between the target client and each source client on a small local mini-batch, and selectively fuses only the most compatible features. Extensive experiments on domain-heterogeneous benchmarks such as DomainNet, PACS, and Office-Home demonstrate that CRIP consistently outperforms local models and state-of-the-art baselines, validating the effectiveness of representation-space personalization under extreme domain heterogeneity.
Zijian Jiang, Chaoli Sun, Handing Wang et al.· 0 citations
Visual token compression for vision--language models (VLMs) has largely relied on criteria such as attention, redundancy, and uncertainty to maximize average accuracy under a fixed compute budget, implicitly assuming that all errors carry equal cost. However, the consequence of an incorrect prediction on downstream tasks is rarely symmetric: misreading an invoice amount can be far more costly than misclassifying a background color. Motivated by this, we introduce consequence-sensitive visual token compression, which allocates visual computation across requests according to their potential error costs. Our method follows a calibrate-then-allocate procedure, estimating consequence-specific error-budget curves offline and applying the calibrated token budgets online using consequence signals available from question or task information. On a controlled within-task benchmark, high- and low-consequence questions are drawn from the same document images, so content alone cannot reveal which questions are costly to get wrong. In this setting, our method reduces high-stakes errors from 0.300 to 0.133 under the same total token budget, whereas a content-driven allocator performs no better than uniform allocation. Measuring how error rates change with token budget across different cost ratios, we derive an allocation frontier: uniform allocation is optimal when errors are equally costly, and token transfer toward high-consequence questions becomes increasingly beneficial as the cost gap grows. This allocation principle generalizes well across three dense vision-language benchmarks, two budget realization mechanisms (token deletion and resolution reallocation), two VLM architectures, and multiple token selection strategies. On a realistic mixed workload, consequence-sensitive allocation reduces cost-weighted error by 38% while achieving approximately 21% lower latency than full-resolution inference.
Jing Wen, Liang He, Mingyu Cao et al.· 0 citations
