Skip to content

Soft Symbol Grounding for Prototypical Concepts

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Soft-PNet matches loss-engineered prototypical networks at the concept and label levels and recovers concepts that soft-grounding baselines miss, with no loss engineering and lower training time.

Abstract

Neuro-symbolic models are usually trained with supervision only on final labels, leaving the intermediate concepts unobserved. Since many concept assignments are consistent with a given label, training can predict labels correctly while recovering the wrong concepts, a failure known as a reasoning shortcut. Prototypical networks reduce shortcuts by anchoring each concept to a few labeled examples, but existing methods still couple perception and reasoning through a hand-crafted, task-specific differentiable loss that must be redesigned for every task. We introduce \textbf{Soft-PNet}, which removes this loss: it reframes concept grounding as a Metropolis walk over a precomputed cache of feasible symbolic solutions, guided by a prototype distribution built from a single labeled anchor per concept, and trains against one KL objective between the prototype-weighted cache and the network's concept predictions. The objective is identical across tasks and remains applicable when the solution space cannot be enumerated. On \texttt{MNIST-EvenOdd}, Visual Sudoku, and \texttt{Kand-Logic} under scarce supervision, Soft-PNet matches loss-engineered prototypical networks at the concept and label levels and recovers concepts that soft-grounding baselines miss, with no loss engineering and lower training time.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

AnyBottle: A Recipe to Only Keep the Concepts You Really Need

Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) make predictions inspectable and intervenable by routing them through human-interpretable concepts, but originally required concept annotations. Annotation-free variants remove this requirement, but typically use large concept vocabularies, static at both training and inference, produci...

Wolfgang Stammer, Sukrut Rao, Hevra Petekkaya et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

RelateAnything: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Relation Prediction From Any Inputs

Open-vocabulary detection accepts any class list at inference, and promptable segmentation returns regions without class names: the taxonomy has left the model and become an input. Relation prediction has not. Scene-graph models are still trained and evaluated on the 50 or 56 predicates of one annotation style, their r...

Maelic Neau · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

LANTERN: Illuminating Hidden Mathematical Knowledge in Language Models

Language models can now prove theorems, but people still decide which problems to pursue. We ask whether a model's internal representations can help identify promising mathematical connections. We develop LANTERN, a fast, cost-efficient pipeline that uses a classifier over pretrained-model activations to rank candidate...

Pavel Tikhonov, Elena Tutubalina, I. Oseledets et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Rules Amortize, Pairings Don't: Linguistic Structure Determines What Latent Task Representations Can Replace In-Context Learning

In-context learning (ICL) can be amortized into latent objects (task vectors, function vectors, context vectors) that recover few-shot behavior at zero-shot inference cost, but recent theory shows a static vector acts as a single synthetic demonstration and must fail on high-rank mappings such as word-level bijections....

Gunmay Jhingran · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Weakly supervised concept Bottleneck Learning for Robust Two stage Object centric visual reasoning

This work introduces the Dynamic Orthogonal Concept Bottleneck (D-OCB), an object-centric slot- VAE framework designed to extract human-aligned symbolic predicates under extremely weak supervision and achieves high concept alignment and downstream visual reasoning accuracy using minimal label budgets, matching or outpe...

Sparsh Tiwari, Gesina Schwalbe, Bettina Finzel · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Augustinian BabyLM: What Ostensive Definition Can and Cannot Teach a Small Language Model

A language model normally begins training with random word embeddings: whatever'banana'means must be learned from training corpora. I implement St. Augustine's picture of word learning, meaning by ostension, for a small masked language model (DeBERTa) trained on 10M words: before training, visually grounded tokens rece...

Lisa Bylinina · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.