Skip to content
Review Open access

The Role of Statistical Concepts in the Development of Artificial Intelligence for Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review

Jul 2026 · Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) · Vol 4, pp. 803-814 · 0 citations · 22 references

TL;DR

This study aims to systematically identify, review, and synthesize the role of statistical concepts in AI development for auditing, including their implementation, benefits, challenges, and future directions.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly been adopted in auditing, however the role of statistical methods in improving AI performance and reliability remains fragmented. This study aims to systematically identify, review, and synthesize the role of statistical concepts in AI development for auditing, including their implementation, benefits, challenges, and future directions. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA framework was conducted on 149 studies published between 2017 and 2026 from Google Scholar, Scopus, and SciSpace. The findings reveal a significant increase in AI auditing research since 2023. Regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and Bayesian inference are the most frequently applied statistical methods, supporting fraud detection, risk assessment, audit sampling, anomaly detection, and model validation. Integrating statistical methods with AI improves prediction accuracy, interpretability, transparency, and audit quality. However, challenges remain regarding data quality, model interpretability, auditor competency, and AI governance. Future research should prioritize hybrid AI-statistical models, Explainable AI, and adaptive Bayesian approaches to enhance trustworthy data-driven auditing

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial intelligence's use in external auditing: Evidence from systematic literature review

This study examines artificial intelligence (AI) in external auditing by synthesizing existing evidence, clarifying key concepts, identifying theoretical and methodological gaps, and outlining future research directions.  A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis were conducted on 130 peer-reviewed articles retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science databases. The review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, while VOSviewer was used to map research trends, and thematic clusters. Research on AI in auditing has grown substantially, with the United States, China, and the United Kingdom leading scholarly contributions. The analysis identified three dominant research streams: machine learning and fraud detection, audit analytics and big data, and AI adoption and governance. Commonly applied AI techniques include machine learning, neural networks, natural language processing, robotic process automation, and expert systems. The study suggested that AI enhances fraud detection, risk assessment, and audit quality, while raising concerns regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, and professional skepticism. The study develops an integrated framework linking AI applications to audit quality and provides a research agenda to guide future inquiry. The findings offer practical insights for auditors, regulators, and organizations seeking to implement AI responsibly and effectively in audit processes.

Jimoh, Adams Lukman, Audrey Legodi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable artificial intelligence in accounting and financial auditing: a systematic review

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a response to the need to understand and make transparent the decisions of machine learning models, particularly in sensitive contexts such as accounting and financial auditing. In this domain, XAI enables the interpretation of results generated by automated systems applied to fraud detection, risk management, financial analysis, and regulatory compliance, thereby strengthening the trust of auditors and regulators. The objective of this study was to systematically analyze the literature on XAI in accounting and financial auditing in order to identify its application domains, the methods employed, and the main challenges reported. The research was conducted through a systematic literature review following the PRISMA protocol, based on studies retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science. The selected works were organized and synthesized using an analysis matrix, resulting in 85 primary studies. The findings indicate that XAI is mainly applied to fraud detection, credit assessment, financial auditing, and decision-support processes, with a predominance of techniques such as SHAP and LIME. Although these tools enhance transparency, limitations related to computational cost, data quality, explanation stability, and regulatory adaptation persist, highlighting the need to strengthen their integration into auditing processes. Systematic review registration https://osf.io/pb5cy/.

Iván Patricio Arias-González, Gabriela Serrano-Torres, Eduardo Ramiro Dávalos-Mayorga et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Audit Quality, and the Future of Professional Judgment: Policy and Governance Challenges in Auditing - A Systematic Literature Review

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into auditing has created a paradigm shift, presenting both unprecedented opportunities to enhance audit quality and significant policy challenges that threaten the foundations of professional judgment. This systematic literature review analyses peer-reviewed articles to synthesize the current landscape of AI in auditing and identify the primary policy challenges confronting the profession. Our analysis reveals a fundamental tension between the automation of audit tasks and the preservation of professional skepticism and judgment. Key themes emerging from the literature include the paradox of professional judgment in an automated environment, the double-edged sword of AI in enhancing audit quality while introducing new risks, the critical need for transparency and explainability in AI systems, the pervasive threat of algorithmic bias, and the significant gaps in regulatory frameworks and professional standards. The findings indicate that while AI offers powerful tools for data analysis, fraud detection, and risk assessment, its adoption is hampered by a complex web of ethical, technical, and organizational barriers. The primary policy challenges identified include regulatory lag, the erosion of professional identity, new quality assurance demands, evolving competency standards, the need for robust ethical frameworks, unresolved liability issues, and a lack of standardization. This review concludes that the auditing profession is at a critical juncture, requiring a concerted effort from regulators, standard-setters, firms, and educators to navigate the transformative impact of AI. I propose a research agenda focused on the long-term effects of AI on professional judgment, the effectiveness of governance models, and the development of new audit methodologies that effectively integrate human and machine intelligence.

Geoffrey Odoch · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Auditing Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Survey of Current Frameworks, Principles and Approaches

Over the past decade, the exponential integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across various sectors has been propelled by significant advances in machine learning algorithms, data availability, and computational power. This progress has produced highly effective AI systems, but also underscores the critical need for effective auditing to critically evaluate these technologies. In this paper, we conduct a systematic review of the literature on methodologies, frameworks, and techniques for auditing AI systems, focusing on legal and ethical considerations and compliance with regulations. By reviewing key academic databases, including Google Scholar, IEEE, ACM, and Springer, we establish the scope of our survey and derive topics from our research questions. Our findings reveal gaps in current auditing practices and highlight the importance of incorporating AI value chain stages and AI maturity levels into auditing frameworks. This approach enables us to distinguish and recommend existing frameworks and methodologies that are most suitable for the specific contexts of different organisations, thus enhancing the effectiveness of AI system evaluations.

Usman Shahbaz, Amin Beheshti, B. Abedin et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Auditing Practice in Nigeria

The increasing complexity of public financial transactions, rising accountability expectations, and limitations associated with conventional audit approaches have created the need for innovative technologies capable of improving auditing effectiveness. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology with significant potential to reshape auditing practices through automation, advanced data analytics, predictive modelling, and intelligent decision support. This study examines the influence of Artificial Intelligence adoption on auditing practice within Nigeria’s public sector, focusing on its effects on audit efficiency, fraud detection capability, and audit quality. The study adopted a quantitative research approach using a structured questionnaire administered to public sector auditors and accounting professionals. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The findings revealed that Artificial Intelligence adoption has a significant positive influence on audit efficiency, fraud detection capability, and audit quality. The regression results showed that AI adoption significantly improves audit outcomes by enabling faster data analysis, enhancing risk identification, and strengthening the reliability of audit evidence. The study further revealed that while AI provides substantial opportunities for improving public sector accountability, challenges such as inadequate digital infrastructure, limited technological competencies, data governance concerns, and ethical issues may constrain effective implementation. The study concludes that Artificial Intelligence should be viewed as an enabling technology that complements professional auditing judgment rather than replacing human auditors. It recommends strategic investment in digital audit infrastructure, continuous AI-related capacity development for auditors, and the establishment of appropriate governance frameworks to support responsible AI adoption within Nigeria’s public sector auditing environment.

S. J. Inyada, Sule Joseph · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Critical Review Journal Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence Development in the Accounting Domain: The Case for Auditing Melia A. Baldwin, Carol E. Brown, & Brad S. Trinkle (2006)

This critical review aims to analyze the article by Baldwin, Brown, and Trinkle (2006) titled Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence Development in the Accounting Domain: The Case for Auditing. The article discusses the opportunities for developing Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the accounting field, particularly in auditing and assurance processes. The method used in this review is a literature study with a descriptive-analytical approach to the article's content, covering research objectives, methods, main findings, contributions, as well as the strengths and limitations of the article. The review results show that auditing is a very potential field for AI application because it involves analyzing large amounts of data, complex decision-making, professional judgment, and anomaly and fraud detection. The authors of the article emphasize that AI is not intended to replace auditors, but rather serves as a tool to enhance efficiency, effectiveness. and the quality of audits. Although this article has limitations because it is conceptual and not yet supported by empirical evidence, the review provides an important contribution as an initial theoretical foundation for research on AI in auditing. Thus, this article remains relevant to be used as a reference in research on audit analytics, continuous auditing, fraud detection, and the use of AI technology in the accounting profession.

Muslimin, Nahwani Fadelan, Wahid Hasyim et al. · 0 citations