This work provides a conceptual foundation for governance-aware, adaptable, and AI-first software engineering methods by proposing a metamodel that treats autonomy not as a fixed property of an actor, but as a derived, situation-dependent authority assignment determined by task, context, and collaboration pattern.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is shifting software engineering from tool-supported processes towards AI-first collaboration, where authority is dynamically distributed across human and artificial actors. However, existing method engineering approaches assume static, human-centric control and provide limited support explicitly capturing evolving autonomy. This paper presents a vision for autonomy-aware method engineering by proposing a metamodel that treats autonomy not as a fixed property of an actor, but as a derived, situation-dependent authority assignment determined by task, context, and collaboration pattern. The metamodel formalizes autonomy through four authority dimensions: task execution, task decomposition, task initiation, and collaboration reconfiguration. Through an analytical instantiation with a multi-agent requirements analysis tool, we illustrate how the metamodel supports dynamic authority assignment. This work provides a conceptual foundation for governance-aware, adaptable, and AI-first software engineering methods.
It is argued that desired-state management architectures provide a natural implementation substrate for the AAB model and have direct relevance for cloud infrastructure architects, platform engineering organizations, and policymakers engaged with AI governance in high-stakes operational contexts.
Shaileshbhai Revabhai Gothi· International journal of com...· 0 citations
SDD reconstitutes, in specification-centric form, the contracts that vibe coding dissolves: accountability, verifiability, and transferability, and outlines a research agenda for future empirical validation.
J. Díaz, J. Gayoso, Andrea Cimminio et al.· 2 citations
The emergence of AI agents is expected to reshape software engineering by moving beyond AI as assistants towards systems capable of planning, executing, and evaluating development tasks with increasing autonomy. This transition is particularly significant for embedded software organizations, where strict requirements f...
V. Kjellberg, Srijita Basu, Si-Min Sun et al.· 0 citations
The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design.
M. R· International Journal of Phi...· 0 citations
Agentic AI can interpret information, plan, make workflow decisions, and use enterprise tools. Yet technical capability does not establish authoritative meaning, legitimate process state, organisational permission, or accountable execution. The challenge is to preserve adaptability while ensuring that consequential act...
The framework offers managers actionable guidance for deploying agentic AI responsibly and offers regulators a structured basis for balancing innovation with oversight, while extending agency theory and sociotechnical systems theory through a reconceptualisation of agentic AI as a sociotechnical principal-cum-agent.
Mohammad Talha Siddiqui, Usuf Kamal· BIMTECH Business Perspective...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.