Jul 2026· International Journal of Applied Linguistics· 0 citations· 33 references
TL;DR
Findings highlight both the promise and limitations of integrating GenAI into writing instruction and provide insights into the design of pedagogical frameworks that combine PBWI with tailored GenAI tools at the secondary level.
Abstract
While the benefits of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in supporting various cognitive processes in writing have been documented, most research has examined single stages of the writing process and focused on university students. This study addresses this gap by developing a domain‐specific GenAI chatbot and embedding it within a process‐based writing instruction (PBWI) program to explore its effectiveness and challenges in supporting secondary students’ Chinese writing across the three cognitive stages. A total of 100 first‐year secondary students participated in three conditions: the experimental group received PBWI with GenAI chatbot support, the control group received PBWI without GenAI, and the baseline group continued product‐based instruction. Data from writing tasks, questionnaires, and interviews were analyzed using a mixed‐methods approach. Results indicated that students reported benefits of the GenAI chatbot in supporting their writing across the three cognitive stages, as well as in both lower‐ and higher‐level aspects of writing. However, their performance outcomes did not significantly exceed those of the control group, likely owing to the added cognitive load of managing both PBWI and GenAI use. Students nonetheless expressed a strong intention to continue using the chatbot and reported enhanced confidence and motivation. These findings highlight both the promise and limitations of integrating GenAI into writing instruction and provide insights into the design of pedagogical frameworks that combine PBWI with tailored GenAI tools at the secondary level.
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into creative writing is a growing trend. However, few studies have examined primary school students' interactions with GenAI alongside their writing experiences and resulting writing products.
This study compared creative writing performance, w...
Xin Liu, Yi Wen, Xiao-Zhe Yang et al.· Journal of Computer Assisted...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that students’ acceptance of GenAI was closely connected to the task it supported, and the need for pedagogically guided AI integration that supports student learning engagement while promoting critical and independent AI use is highlighted.
T. Nguyen· Proceedings of The Internati...· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has rapidly entered creativity-oriented education since 2022, yet evidence on its applications and roles in school-aged student creativity development (SCD) remains fragmented. This systematic review addresses two questions: (1) What architectures, tools, and modalities of Gen...
Yu Wang, Lei-Ying Wu, Yi-Wen Jiang et al.· Journal of educational compu...· 0 citations
A “Dialectical AI-Scaffolding Framework” is proposed designed to shift ChatGPT from a product-generation tool to an intellectual sparring partner, ensuring that GenAI advances rather than compromises critical thinking in ESL pedagogy.
E. Raju, E. Namratha· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that GenAI plays a dual, context-dependent role, particularly by supporting idea generation, material development, and pedagogical innovation, and suggests that GenAI should be used as a collaborative tool.
Tetyana Bidna· Advances in Education· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.