Skip to content
Open access

AP_Lab:

Aug 2026 · Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568) · 0 citations

TL;DR

The AP_Lab system enabled rubric-centered assessment of individual procedural performance and group teamwork behaviour, while allowing assessors to replay video evidence and store all marks, comments and evidence links in a single retrievable record.

Abstract

In laboratory courses, students' practical performance must be evaluated systematically, and records must be kept reliably, clearly, and easily accessible. This study introduces the AP_Lab system, engineered with methodologies for conducting online practical assessments and providing a storage platform to facilitate laboratory instruction and evaluation. The system combines all course requirements, including the syllabus, lab manual, assessment rubrics, Bloom's taxonomy alignment, and standard operating procedure (SOP) compliance. The AP_Lab system has several connected interfaces for entering data, recording assessments, and tracing them back. Two test-run sessions were held to evaluate the system adequacy, the usability of the user interface and the functional integrity of the navigation links. The insights gained during the test runs were considered to further improve system functionality and design. The first test run included a group of teachers who had taught in a lab to ensure that the assessment workflow was both useful and appropriate. The AP_Lab system enabled rubric-centered assessment of individual procedural performance and group teamwork behaviour, while allowing assessors to replay video evidence and store all marks, comments and evidence links in a single retrievable record. These strengthen assessment traceability and reduce reliance on fragmented paper-based marking. User evaluation indicated high acceptance among students (n = 30) and lecturers (n = 10), with excellent reliability (Cronbach’s  = 0.92 overall) and high mean satisfaction (4.21  0.5). Although lecturers rated the system slightly higher than students, the difference was not statistically significant.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Human-in-the-Loop LLM Assessment for Programming Education: Design and Empirical Validation

The system attained a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 88.5 and cut grading time by 87.5 percent, facilitating focused instructor review in LLM-supported programming assessments, facilitating focused instructor review in LLM-supported programming assessments.

A. Ibrahim, Runal Rezkiawan · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Outcomes: Assessing the Process of Problem Solving Using Process Education

It is argued that process-oriented assessment offers a constructive response to generative AI by shifting attention from detecting tool use to evaluating the quality of student reasoning, and supports growth-oriented feedback that helps learners improve their learning skills and future performances.

Joshua Morrison · 0 citations
Review

Evaluating the usability of integrated development environments

Assessment of the usability of three commonly used programming environments in higher education, NetBeans, Eclipse, and Dev-C++, through a System Usability Scale (SUS) survey, with participation from 143 computer engineering students highlighted NetBeans, Eclipse, and Visual Studio as the most commonly used IDEs.

J. Morales, Fabián Silva-Aravena, Paula Sáez · 0 citations
#software testing Review Open access Sep 2026

Needs Analysis of Office Administration Laboratories to Improve Practical Learning Quality and Student Competence

Background: The Department of Business Administration uses several laboratories to support practical learning, including computer, business simulation, typing, competency testing (TUK), and banking laboratories. Objective: This research was conducted to analyze the needs of office administration laboratories in improvi...

Mariskha Z, Esya Alhadi, Afrizawati Afrizawati et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.