Aug 2026· Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568)· 0 citations
TL;DR
The AP_Lab system enabled rubric-centered assessment of individual procedural performance and group teamwork behaviour, while allowing assessors to replay video evidence and store all marks, comments and evidence links in a single retrievable record.
Abstract
In laboratory courses, students' practical performance must be evaluated systematically, and records must be kept reliably, clearly, and easily accessible. This study introduces the AP_Lab system, engineered with methodologies for conducting online practical assessments and providing a storage platform to facilitate laboratory instruction and evaluation. The system combines all course requirements, including the syllabus, lab manual, assessment rubrics, Bloom's taxonomy alignment, and standard operating procedure (SOP) compliance. The AP_Lab system has several connected interfaces for entering data, recording assessments, and tracing them back. Two test-run sessions were held to evaluate the system adequacy, the usability of the user interface and the functional integrity of the navigation links. The insights gained during the test runs were considered to further improve system functionality and design. The first test run included a group of teachers who had taught in a lab to ensure that the assessment workflow was both useful and appropriate. The AP_Lab system enabled rubric-centered assessment of individual procedural performance and group teamwork behaviour, while allowing assessors to replay video evidence and store all marks, comments and evidence links in a single retrievable record. These strengthen assessment traceability and reduce reliance on fragmented paper-based marking. User evaluation indicated high acceptance among students (n = 30) and lecturers (n = 10), with excellent reliability (Cronbach’s = 0.92 overall) and high mean satisfaction (4.21 0.5). Although lecturers rated the system slightly higher than students, the difference was not statistically significant.
The system attained a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 88.5 and cut grading time by 87.5 percent, facilitating focused instructor review in LLM-supported programming assessments, facilitating focused instructor review in LLM-supported programming assessments.
A. Ibrahim, Runal Rezkiawan· EDUMATIC: Jurnal Pendidikan...· 0 citations
It is argued that process-oriented assessment offers a constructive response to generative AI by shifting attention from detecting tool use to evaluating the quality of student reasoning, and supports growth-oriented feedback that helps learners improve their learning skills and future performances.
Joshua Morrison· Intersection: A Journal at t...· 0 citations
Assessment of the usability of three commonly used programming environments in higher education, NetBeans, Eclipse, and Dev-C++, through a System Usability Scale (SUS) survey, with participation from 143 computer engineering students highlighted NetBeans, Eclipse, and Visual Studio as the most commonly used IDEs.
J. Morales, Fabián Silva-Aravena, Paula Sáez· 0 citations
Background: The Department of Business Administration uses several laboratories to support practical learning, including computer, business simulation, typing, competency testing (TUK), and banking laboratories.
Objective: This research was conducted to analyze the needs of office administration laboratories in improvi...