The method repurposes DR-RL trajectories, which naturally contain search histories, visited webpages, evidence snippets, and final-answer supervision, and replaces the compact snippets and webpage summaries in each trajectory with the full contents of their corresponding URLs, producing substantially longer multi-document contexts while preserving the original evidence relationships.
Abstract
Deepresearch (DR) agents interact with real-world web environments through multi-turn search and visit, causing their contexts to grow rapidly over time. We observe that, even after DR Agentic Reinforcement Learning (DR-RL), 61.6% of the model's remaining prediction errors can still be attributed to insufficient long-context understanding, including longcontext hallucination and failures in cross-document evidence integration. It motivates us to further break the bottleneck of DR-RL by strengthening the model's long-context ability. However, effective LongContext training requires more than simply increasing context length. To bridge the data gap, we propose `DR Rollouts to LongContext-QA (DR-to-Long)'. The method repurposes DR-RL trajectories, which naturally contain search histories, visited webpages, evidence snippets, and final-answer supervision. It then replaces the compact snippets and webpage summaries in each trajectory with the full contents of their corresponding URLs, producing substantially longer multi-document contexts while preserving the original evidence relationships. Building on DR-to-Long, we introduce DLD (DR ->LongQA ->DR)-RL. DLD-RL first performs a short DR-RL stage to collect rollout trajectories, which are then converted into LongQA instances at zero annotation cost. The model is subsequently optimized with LongQA-RL to strengthen LongContext ability, followed by full DR-RL to continue improving its DR capability. Experiments show that DLD-RL outperforms standard DR-RL by 7.3% on three Deepresearch benchmarks and improves performance by 13.5% on three long-context benchmarks.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
A study with 42 participants investigates the relationship between the affective states, creativity, and analytical problem-solving skills of software developers and offers support for the claim that happy developers are indeed better problem solvers in terms of their analytical abilities.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· PeerJ· 216 citations· ⚡13
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.