Skip to content
#edge computing Review Open access

Large Language Model-Driven Autonomous UAV Systems: Technical Evolution, Core Architectures, and Critical Challenges

Sep 2026 · Intelligence & Control · 0 citations · 87 references

TL;DR

This survey reviews the technical evolution, system architectures, and deployment challenges of LLM-driven UAVs across perception, planning, control, multi-agent coordination, and edge–cloud computing, and separates semantic-reasoning latency, control timing, power, task outcomes, hardware, and validation settings to avoid misleading cross-platform comparisons.

Abstract

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has expanded the capabilities of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems in naturallanguage instruction understanding, multimodal perception, and decision-making. This survey reviews the technical evolution, system architectures, and deployment challenges of LLM-driven UAVs across perception, planning, control, multi-agent coordination, and edge–cloud computing. Beyond cataloguing representative systems, we separate semantic-reasoning latency, control timing, power, task outcomes, hardware, and validation settings to avoid misleading cross-platform comparisons. We further analyze Sim2Real gaps, intermittent connectivity, hallucination-induced action risk, cyberattacks, and privacy leakage. In this survey, a semantically adaptive safety certificate denotes a runtime-verifiable CBF/MPC/STL constraint whose safe set or margin is parameterized by grounded task and scene semantics but enforced by a deterministic safety layer outside the generative model. Future directions emphasize hierarchical lightweight reasoning, communication-aware autonomy, formally bounded semantic adaptation, and airworthiness-oriented assurance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Nov 2025

UAVBench: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous and Agentic AI UAV Systems via LLM-Generated Flight Scenarios

Autonomous aerial systems increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) for mission planning, perception, and decision-making; yet, the lack of standardized, physically grounded benchmarks limits systematic evaluation of their reasoning capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce UAVBench, an open benchmark dat...

M. Ferrag, Abderrahmane Lakas, Mérouane Debbah · 16 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Large Language Models for UAV Autonomy from a Perception–Cognition–Action Perspective

Deployable autonomy remains a key challenge for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operating in open-ended missions. Large language models (LLMs) and their multimodal variants, which can process visual and other sensory inputs, have introduced new capabilities for semantic perception, task reasoning, and language-conditio...

Ting-Quan Xiong, Jianning Zhan, Qiu-Wei Deng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

PhysAI-Bench: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Agentic Decision-Making in Autonomous UAV-Centric Physical AI

The PhysAI-Bench is introduced, a benchmark for evaluating the agentic decision-making required for reliable autonomy in Physical AI, which contains 10,178 standardized decision instances automatically extracted from conversational traces of autonomous UAV missions.

M. Ferrag, Mérouane Debbah, Abderrahmane Lakas et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Talk-to-Fly: An Agentic LLM Runtime for Natural-Language UAV Task Control

The current integration of large language models (LLMs) with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offers a promising approach to more accessible UAV task control. However, existing methods utilise LLMs as one-shot planners, which are vulnerable to changes in vehicle state and dynamic operating conditions. This paper introdu...

Jack Morgan, Zhuang-Kun Wei, Hong-Jian Sun · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Vision-Language Models as copilots for Autonomous UAV Navigation: Analysis of Latency and Reliability in Degraded Environments

The integration of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) offers unprecedented semantic reasoning capabilities. However, real-time closed-loop navigation requires not only low inference latency but also obedience to structured flight commands. This paper proposes a hybrid FSM-VLM co...

Hiago Sodre, Sebastian Barcelona, Vincent Sandin et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.