Automatic and human evaluation on DIPLOMAT confirm that DIPLOMAT consistently outperforms baselines in generating coherent, polite, and persuasive negotiation responses.
Abstract
Effective workplace negotiation requires balancing multiple objectives, including achieving task goals, preserving professional relationships, and resolving conflicts constructively. However, misunderstandings, misaligned preferences, and interpersonal friction often impede successful outcomes. Politeness mitigates these challenges by fostering trust, reducing tension, and preventing escalation, and persuasive communication helps overcome resistance, align preferences, and guide participants toward mutually beneficial agreements. Motivated by these insights, we present DIPLOMAT, a dialogue system for polite and persuasive workplace negotiation. To support its development, we introduce PROWESS, a dataset of multi-turn workplace negotiation dialogues generated via a multi-agent framework and enriched withnegotiation strategies, politeness levels, persuasive strategies. DIPLOMAT is trained using Dialogue-Span-Aware Direct Preference Optimization (DSA-DPO), a novel preference learning objective that identifies key dialogue spans for preference alignment. This enables DIPLOMAT to generate contextually coherent responses that employ intended negotiation strategies, maintain politeness, and incorporate effective persuasion strategies throughout interactions. Automatic and human evaluation on PROWESS confirm that DIPLOMAT consistently outperforms baselines in generating coherent, polite, and persuasive negotiation responses.
PersuaRL is introduced, a reinforcement learning-based framework that equips LLM-driven dialogue agents with the ability to adaptively explore, select, and coordinate strategies across multiple expert modules, guided by the evolving dialogue context, to achieve more effective persuasion.
Rohan Kirti, Akash Ghosh, Aryan Vats et al.· 0 citations
A systematic gap between rhetorical fluency and formal argumentative strength in LLM-based persuasive dialogues is found in multi-agent and retrieval-augmented variants, which reveals a consistent decoupling between subjective and formal persuasiveness.
J. Robinson, Angus R. Williams, Katie Atkinson et al.· 0 citations
Political polarization makes constructive cross-partisan dialogue increasingly difficult, and human facilitators are subject to bias and cognitive limits when tracking evolving stances in multi-party debates. We propose a Socially Interactive Agent that acts as an active mediator by fusing non-verbal cues with real-tim...
Nahuel Gómez· Proceedings of the 28th Inte...· 0 citations
The results support PragAlign as a quality-control framework for improving evaluator-defined communicative constraint satisfaction, while showing that affective realization and independent human-perceived quality remain open challenges.
This paper designs TACT to revise student-generated actions, test the revisions through partner responses, and distill useful feedback into the student, which helps improve social goal attainment while reducing communication cost.
Lin-Xiao Gong, Yijie Xu, Tian-Fu Wang et al.· 0 citations
Collaborative dialogue in multi-agent settings often requires interlocutors to integrate partially overlapping perceptual information in order to construct a shared representation of a dynamic environment. We introduce PAIR, a pilot conversational corpus designed to examine how humans coordinate under systematic percep...
Lewis Watson, Carl Strathearn, Kenny Mitchell et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations