Skip to content

GRUET: Quantifying Uncertainty of Agentic Reasoning-and-Acting Processes

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The Graph-based Reasoning UncErtainty in Trajectories (GRUET) method for the uncertainty quantification of ReAct is presented, comprising turn-level reasoning uncertainty quantification and trajectory-level uncertainty aggregation; the former precisely quantifies reasoning uncertainty via modeling the reasoning space spanned by potential reasoning branches as a graph.

Abstract

Agents have attracted considerably increasing attention due to the power of executing both Reasoning and Acting (ReAct) in open and dynamic environments. The ReAct process typically exhibits a multi-turn trajectory in which one drives Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate both reasoning chains and task-specific actions in an interleaved manner. However, agents often suffer from significant uncertainty, where identical tasks yield divergent trajectories; trajectories with higher uncertainty often produce incomprehensible behaviors, severely undermining agent credibility. This work conjectures that such trajectory-level uncertainty frequently stems from cumulative turn-level reasoning uncertainty induced by LLMs; the latter often exhibits a collection of branches of divergent reasoning chains and their resulting actions. Built upon this, we present the Graph-based Reasoning UncErtainty in Trajectories (GRUET) method for the uncertainty quantification of ReAct, comprising turn-level reasoning uncertainty quantification and trajectory-level uncertainty aggregation; the former precisely quantifies reasoning uncertainty via modeling the reasoning space spanned by potential reasoning branches as a graph and then approximating the reasoning space complexity with graph complexity, while the latter employs simple aggregation strategies for quantifying the overall trajectory credibility. Empirical evaluations across nine LLMs and five benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our proposed GRUET in terms of selective generation performance, measured by AUROC, AUPRC, and AUARC.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.