A blood-to-tumor framework is proposed in which dynamic peripheral phenotypes may monitor systemic immune competence, while tissue multi-omics may identify local immune exclusion, terminal exhaustion, and myeloid suppression.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade has changed the therapeutic landscape of cervical cancer, but clinical benefit remains heterogeneous and difficult to predict with single biomarkers. Cervical cancer is a particularly suitable setting for immune-cell profiling because HPV-driven antigenicity, chemoradiotherapy-induced tissue remodeling, anti-angiogenic combinations, and repeated exposure to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors all shape the blood-tumor immune axis. This Mini Review discusses how circulating immune cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells can be jointly interrogated by multi-omics technologies to identify biomarkers of response and resistance. We focus on single-cell RNA sequencing, T-cell receptor/B-cell receptor (TCR/BCR) profiling, cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITE-seq), flow cytometry, spatial transcriptomics, high-plex spatial proteomics, bulk transcriptomics, cytokine profiling, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-informed longitudinal designs. Recent cervical cancer atlases suggest that response is unlikely to be explained by total immune infiltration alone, but instead reflects the spatial organization and functional states of cytotoxic T cells, NK cells, antigen-presenting cells, tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) programs, regulatory T cells, myeloid cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). We propose a blood-to-tumor framework in which dynamic peripheral phenotypes may monitor systemic immune competence, while tissue multi-omics may identify local immune exclusion, terminal exhaustion, and myeloid suppression. Prospective paired sampling and interpretable, externally validated AI-assisted computational integration are needed before these biomarkers can guide treatment selection.
The pivotal roles of biomarkers in SCLC are highlighted, underscoring their contributions to treatment resistance across tumor-intrinsic mechanisms, immune landscape of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and systemic host factors.
Shu-Xing Wang, Xin-rui Zhao, Yue-Yue Zeng et al.· Critical reviews in oncology...· 0 citations
Abstract Background Combination immune checkpoint inhibition with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies improves outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), yet 40–60% of patients fail to achieve meaningful responses. Robust biomarkers that predict deep and durable responses are lacking. We aimed to define syste...
S. Guglietta, A. Bärenwaldt, Anthony Sonrel et al.· The Oncologist· 0 citations
Abstract Background Checkpoint blockade (CPB) has limited efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), warranting improved therapeutic strategies capable of remodeling the tumor microenvironment. Stem-like TCF1+CD8+ T cells, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, and lymphoid aggregates have been associated with CPB responsiven...
C. Minnar, Masaya Miyamoto, Asma S. Khelifa et al.· Journal for ImmunoTherapy of...· 0 citations
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an immunogenic but clinically heterogeneous breast cancer subtype. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutational burden provide useful but incomplete summaries of the tumor immune microenvironment. Spatial immune biomarkers retain tissue ar...
Liu-Hai Zeng, Wei Lin, Shi-Hang Xue et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
A review summarizes the dynamic landscape of the TNBC immune microenvironment, focusing on the functional roles of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, tumor-associated neutrophils, natural killer cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in regulating antitumor immunity and therapeutic resis...
Hong-Yu Cao, Mei Tao, Xue-Yi Qin et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.