The synthesis indicates that LiDAR remains a strong perceptual backbone for UAV autonomy, but that state-of-the-art systems increasingly combine it with inertial, visual, radar, and learning-based components rather than relying on LiDAR in isolation.
Abstract
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has become a benchmark sensing modality for autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) navigation in GPS-denied and obstacle-dense environments such as forests, urban canyons, and indoor structures. This paper presents a structured review of the LiDAR-based UAV autonomy pipeline, spanning raw point-cloud processing, three-dimensional environment representation and mapping, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), multi-sensor fusion, and real-time obstacle avoidance and trajectory planning. Reactive geometric methods, volumetric and distance-field mapping frameworks, tightly coupled LiDAR–inertial and LiDAR–inertial–visual odometry systems, gradient- and sampling-based trajectory optimizers, and learning-based end-to-end policies are compared with respect to computational cost, robustness, and applicability to resource-constrained micro-UAV platforms. The review further synthesizes current technical bottlenecks, including onboard computational limits, LiDAR performance degradation under adverse atmospheric conditions, and the difficulty of tracking fast-moving dynamic obstacles, as well as emerging research directions such as solid-state LiDAR integration, kinodynamic trajectory optimization, multi-sensor fusion (including radar- and event-camera-assisted schemes), learning-based exploration and foundation-model-based control, multi-UAV collaborative mapping, and simulation-to-reality transfer. The synthesis indicates that LiDAR remains a strong perceptual backbone for UAV autonomy, but that state-of-the-art systems increasingly combine it with inertial, visual, radar, and learning-based components rather than relying on LiDAR in isolation.
Autonomous navigation of multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in complex low-altitude environments remains challenging due to severe onboard computational constraints, sensor blind spots, and unpredictable dynamic obstacles. This paper presents a lightweight, integrated autonomous obstacle avoidance system for q...
Hong-Yu Fan· Twelfth International Sympos...· 0 citations
The integration of LiDAR sensors into quadcopter control systems is fundamental for autonomous navigation in cluttered environments, yet the precise performance trade-offs between different tracking architectures under perceptual uncertainty remain insufficiently quantified. This paper presents a comprehensive 3D compu...
F. N. Murrieta-Rico, Gabriel Trujillo-Hernández, J. A. Amézquita García et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Visual SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) is a core technology for UAV autonomous navigation. However, it suffers from cumulative errors and heading drift in texture-less environments (e.g., sky, water surfaces) or during longterm operation. Traditional methods relying on GPS or inertial sensors face limitati...
Junwei Lv, Qin-Bin Xu, Hao Liu et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) enables real-time six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) state estimation and spatial reconstruction in environments where global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) are unavailable or unreliable. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is particularly suited to this task because it pro...
E. Muhammed, A. Shaker· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
An error-state estimation framework is developed in which RTK-GNSS, IMU, and LiDAR-inertial odometry are combined within a tightly coupled, factor-graph-augmented iterated Kalman filter for UAV state estimation.
S. Saiki, Saadu Olayinka Isiaka, Agu Victor Emezie et al.· Global Journal of Engineerin...· 0 citations
Autonomous landings of uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV) on moving ground vehicles remains a challenging issue, since the reliability of onboard sensors varies during flights. Camera vision measurements may be blurred by motion, partially obscure the target, and be distorted by changes in light. LiDAR height measurements...
Muhammad Bilal Kadri, Sofia Yousuf· IEEE Access· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.