Spotting (and Missing) Algorithmic Bias: Investigating User Understanding in a Fairness Assessment Tool
TL;DR
FairAware, a fairness assessment tool co-designed with Human Resources domain experts, is presented, suggesting that fairness assessment tools for non-experts are usable for identifying biases but need built-in checks on understanding before stakeholders make higher-stakes decisions.
Abstract
Fairness metric selection is typically left to data scientists, but which biases are problematic and which metric captures them best depends on stakeholders'experience and domain knowledge. This calls for involving non-technical stakeholders, but the research prototypes built for this purpose so far have not tested whether these stakeholders form accurate mental models of the metrics they interact with or can act on them to identify biases. We present FairAware, a fairness assessment tool co-designed with Human Resources (HR) domain experts. We evaluate stakeholders'understanding through a mixed-methods study with 70 participants (35 HR employees, 35 job seekers), measuring objective and subjective understanding, cognitive load, bias identification accuracy, and open-ended feedback. Most participants correctly identified the most disadvantaged group, with task duration being the only significant predictor. We also found a gap between subjective and objective understanding, with both groups performing similarly across all measures. These results suggest that fairness assessment tools for non-experts are usable for identifying biases but need built-in checks on understanding before stakeholders make higher-stakes decisions.
