Skip to content

Artificial intelligence-assisted design and CFD re-optimization of graded hybrid metal foams for faster hydrogen desorption in LaNi5 metal-hydride reactors

Oct 2026 · Frontiers in Energy Research · 0 citations · 43 references

Abstract

Heat delivery limits the discharge rate of LaNi5 metal-hydride reactors. This study develops PG-SADE-GHF to co-design radial foam porosity, CuCr1Zr/AlSi10Mg allocation, and transient heat-transfer/pressure scheduling. The original MATLAB surrogate was used only for inexpensive screening. Its selected coordinates were then evaluated directly in OpenFOAM, and the same eight design variables were re-optimized within the original bounds, followed by an expanded-bound sensitivity study. Surrogate accuracy was assessed using 32 OpenFOAM development designs and 12 additional Sobol/maximin designs whose predictions were frozen before their CFD outcomes were computed. A CFD-corrected multifidelity model was then evaluated, and the optimized designs were verified with full-360-degree OpenFOAM calculations on a 196,608-cell mesh. The screening surrogate predicted td = 7.95 min, whereas direct OpenFOAM evaluation of the same coordinates gave 12.192 min. Re-optimization within the original bounds reduced td to 7.817 min, 21.83% faster than the 10-min CuCr1Zr-89% reference, while the expanded-bound sensitivity reached 6.442 min. On the locked held-out challenge, the original surrogate yielded RMSE = 3.354 min and MAE = 3.143 min; the CFD-corrected model achieved R2 = 0.982, RMSE = 0.159 min, MAE = 0.121 min, Spearman rho = 0.986, and 100% coverage of the nominal 95% prediction intervals. Full-360-degreeverification gave 7.8083 min for the original-bound design and 6.4417 min for the expanded design. Reliable acceleration of LaNi5 desorption requires simultaneous structure-material-operation co-design together with explicit high-fidelity discrepancy correction. Final optimum values are therefore based on direct OpenFOAM calculations rather than the screening surrogate. Experimental validation remains required.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

Related blog posts

Hugging Face Blog Oct 20, 2026

MPS in PyTorch 2.15

We’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.