Oct 2026· Educação On-line· 0 citations· 1 references
TL;DR
The article proposes understanding AI as a dialogic sparring partner capable of provoking questions, challenging assumptions, and reshaping the co-construction of knowledge that lies not in replacing human judgment but in expanding the dialogical spaces through which knowledge is produced.
Abstract
The article examines the role of Generative Artificial Intelligence in educational research as a socio-material and epistemic infrastructure embedded in contemporary regimes of power and knowledge production. It aims to move beyond techno-optimistic and techno-sceptical dichotomies by conceptualising AI as a non-neutral assemblage shaped by platform capitalism, data colonialism, and infrastructural dependencies. Drawing on more-than-human perspectives, the article explores how interactions between researchers and generative systems reconfigure processes of knowledge production and agency. While AI may reinforce existing forms of epistemic control, it can also open spaces for critical inquiry and resistance. To support such possibilities, the paper discusses some practices as ways of reconfiguring human–AI relations and avoiding the delegation of epistemic agency. Rather than treating AI as a device for generating answers, the article proposes understanding it as a dialogic sparring partner capable of provoking questions, challenging assumptions, and reshaping the co-construction of knowledge. The value of AI thus lies not in replacing human judgment but in expanding the dialogical spaces through which knowledge is produced.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) is fundamentally reshaping media workflows by restructuring creative processes and the institutional conditions of knowledge production. While current research has deeply analyzed AI through the lenses of automation, algorithmic governance, and professional ethics, the...
D. Tran· International Journal of Ped...· 0 citations
A conceptual evaluation of the extent to which GenAI redistributes students' and teachers'ability to act in classrooms to produce knowledge, validate each other's claims, and create evidence of student learning while collaborating with and competing against humans is presented.
The paper demonstrates the need to reconfigure the anthropocentric conceptual apparatus of science studies to enhance its explanatory adequacy and proposes a shift in research focus toward the empirical analysis of AI’s actual use in scientific practice and the reconstruction of the emergent normative orders within the...
A. Filatova· Epistemology & Philosoph...· 0 citations
With a promise of efficiency-related benefits, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are being rapidly integrated into educational practice, be it officially or not. Yet, a growing corpus of research highlights epistemic, pedagogical, and sociotechnical risks, such as bias, hallucination, surveillance, dependency, and t...
Lucas Guarise, Emanuel Felipe Duarte· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
This paper offers a theoretical and conceptual examination of the emerging convergence between artificial intelligence (AI), the environmental humanities, and sustainability-oriented pedagogy. Positioned at the intersection of ecopedagogy, environmental intelligence theory, and the United Nations Sustainable Developmen...
Williams Rotimi Bejide· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.