Nov 2026· IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing· Vol 25, pp. 20425-20442· 0 citations· 52 references
Abstract
The integrated space-terrestrial network is playing an increasingly crucial role and is expected to become an indispensable component of future communication systems. As the demand for user terminals surges, task congestion issues are becoming more prominent, gradually emerging as a key factor affecting service quality. Most existing task scheduling strategies rely on the shortest forwarding path, with few considering factors such as network load conditions. Moreover, when using multi-satellite coordination to solve this problem, existing methods face drawbacks like local optimization, data leakage, and high communication costs, which result in weak inter-satellite task load-balancing capabilities. To address these issues, this paper proposes the ASCIS, an Adaptive Swarm Collaborative Intelligent Scheduling scheme. It is based on the satellite edge computing operating model, which converts service scenarios as sequential decision problems to implement quantitative optimization. ASCIS utilizes single-node multi-level fusion network to encode service status data, achieves accurate prediction of objective rewards through multi-satellite cluster cooperation, and ultimately incorporates a deep reinforcement learning framework to formulate effective task scheduling strategies, thereby effectively improving network service quality. We also propose an integrated mechanism that combines swarm learning and interactive joint training. By sharing critical gradient and variable, it reduces data transmission volume to lower communication costs. This mechanism also protects user privacy by avoiding the transmission of raw data, and enable broad-perspective data analysis through regional information fusion. Simulation experiments demonstrate that our proposed scheme has significant gains in metrics such as load distribution, task latency, resource utilization, and communication cost. Compared with other state-of-the-art schemes, ASCIS has significant performance advantages in promoting load-balancing.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.