Skip to content
Open access

Practical Predefined-Time Safe Resilient Consensus of Heterogeneous Nonlinear Fractional-Order Multi-Agent Systems Under Hybrid Cyber Attacks

Oct 2026 · Fractal and Fractional · 0 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates safe leader-following consensus of heterogeneous nonlinear Caputo fractional-order multi-agent systems under simultaneous denial-of-service (DoS), sensor-deception, and actuator-deception attacks. A joint augmented observer reconstructs the local state and two deception channels, while a distributed predictor–corrector leader observer operates across normal and DoS intervals. An order-dependent average Mittag–Leffler increment condition is specialized to the considered DoS leader-observation dynamics, thereby avoiding an integer-order switching argument and memory resetting at switching instants. Explicit linear matrix inequalities are provided for the local observer gains, and certified all-time observer envelopes are propagated into a tightened barrier domain so that attack-reconstruction accuracy is quantitatively linked to the physical safety reserve. An innovation-compensated barrier controller with a deadline-dependent gain is then developed. For every initial condition in a prescribed compact safe set, a componentwise Mittag–Leffler inequality guarantees entry into an adjustable residual set no later than a designer-assigned time without claiming exact finite-time convergence of the Caputo state. Two main theorems establish bounded attack reconstruction, DoS-resilient observation, forward invariance of the physical safety set, and practical predefined-time consensus. The numerical study includes a five-follower benchmark, a three-grid refinement analysis, disturbance- and benchmark-gain sensitivity tests, certified post-deadline physical bounds, and a compact two-dimensional case with a nontrivial oscillatory leader for which the adverse-mode rate is strictly positive. These tests verify the observer LMI, analytical safety reserve, DoS condition, and deadline inequality.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.