Nov 2023· IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing· pp. 6345-6349· 4 citations· 30 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
An automatic multi-token debiasing pipeline called General Phrase Debiaser, which is capable of mitigating phrase-level biases in masked language models, and can significantly reduce gender biases on both career and multiple disciplines, across models with varying parameter sizes.
Abstract
The social biases and unwelcome stereotypes revealed by pretrained language models are becoming obstacles to their application. Compared to numerous debiasing methods targeting word level, there has been relatively less attention on biases present at phrase level, limiting the performance of debiasing in discipline domains. In this paper, we propose an automatic multi-token debiasing pipeline called General Phrase Debiaser, which is capable of mitigating phrase-level biases in masked language models. Specifically, our method consists of a phrase filter stage that generates stereotypical phrases from Wikipedia pages as well as a model debias stage that can debias models at the multi-token level to tackle bias challenges on phrases. The latter searches for prompts that trigger model’s bias, and then uses them for debiasing. State-of-the-art results on standard datasets and metrics show that our approach can significantly reduce gender biases on both career and multiple disciplines, across models with varying parameter sizes.
Large language models (LLMs) can reproduce social stereotypes from their training data, motivating extensive research on model debiasing. However, existing methods often rely on explicit biased examples or predefined group-term substitutions, making them sensitive to wording and less effective at capturing stereotype c...
Tian Lan, Xiao-Qing Cheng, Han Zhang et al.· 0 citations
A bias depth score is introduced that measures both how strongly a model prefers its top answer under direct prompting and whether that answer survives scenario reframing and shows that Deep biases are consistently harder to remove than Shallow biases.
A. Vo, V. Dang, Khai-Nguyen Nguyen et al.· 0 citations
When a language model receives two conflicting documents as input, how does it decide which one to prioritize? Does it rely on how the sources are framed or the presentation order of the documents? We evaluated this behavior on Google's pre-trained Gemma 4-e4b model across a targeted behavioral suite (n = 13 items, 784...
Language models tend to agree with whatever a user asserts, and post-training increasingly targets this sycophancy so that models evaluate claims on their merits rather than deferring to the user. Yet the same models are far more compliant when a wrong answer is attributed to a verified source, which is how retrieval r...
Alignment does not eliminate behavioral errors in language models. Models may still refuse benign requests, call unnecessary tools, or yield to false user claims. Current methods mitigate such errors as a computation problem, and rarely explore if the desired behavior is already encoded in the model's representation. M...
Zirui He, Hai-Yan Zhao, Jing-Yu Hu et al.· 0 citations