Aug 2026· Current Issues in Molecular Biology· Vol 48· 0 citations· 33 references
Medicine
TL;DR
An exploratory, integrative analysis using single-cell RNA sequencing of TNBC patients operationally stratified into Good and Bad Prognosis groups suggests a framework in which tumor-intrinsic DNA damage signaling is associated with MHC-I antigen presentation upregulation and CD8 cytotoxic T-cell engagement, supporting further investigation of this axis.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by marked immune microenvironment heterogeneity and variable chemotherapy response, yet the epithelial transcriptional programs governing cytotoxic immune activation remain poorly understood. We performed an exploratory, integrative analysis using single-cell RNA sequencing of 31,962 cells from eight TNBC patients operationally stratified into Good and Bad Prognosis groups based on pathological lymphoid infiltration, a discovery grouping subsequently validated against pathological complete response (pCR) in three independent bulk RNA-seq cohorts. This analysis identified four epithelial transcriptional states. The G5 DNA damage subpopulation—predominantly restricted to Good Prognosis tumors (29.2% vs. 0%)—and the G4 Metabolism subpopulation—2.4-fold enriched in Bad Prognosis—were the primary prognostic signatures. Machine learning validation using nested leave-one-cohort-out (LOCO) cross-validation across 614 samples demonstrated that G4 + G5 raw genes with random forest yielded the largest observed mean AUC of 0.653, though these results are exploratory and do not establish a validated clinical classifier. CellChat ligand–receptor interaction analysis revealed that G5 DNA-damage epithelial cells are the dominant immune activators in Good Prognosis TNBC, predominantly engaging CD8 cytotoxic T cells through MHC-I antigen presentation via HLA-A/B/C/E/F → CD8A/CD8B interactions, the highest-probability signaling pathway identified. Spatial transcriptomics independently validated significantly higher DNA damage and CD8 T-cell scores in Good Prognosis tissue. Together, these exploratory findings suggest a framework in which tumor-intrinsic DNA damage signaling is associated with MHC-I antigen presentation upregulation and CD8 cytotoxic T-cell engagement, supporting further investigation of this axis and its potential implications for combining DNA-damaging chemotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade in TNBC.
A single-cell-informed immune escape signature provides a promising framework for thyroid carcinoma risk stratification and offers insights into personalized immunotherapy.
Ling Jiang, Liu-Yi Zou, Fei-Qi Liu et al.· Korean Journal of Physiology...· 0 citations
This study establishes the PCDsig developed is a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker for breast cancer and provides the first evidence of AP1S1 as a core immunomodulatory oncogene that mediates immune exclusion.
Gui-Xin Wang, Jun Cao, Parhat Kaysar et al.· Chinese journal of cancer re...· 1 citation
This single-cell landscape of chemoresistance-associated proliferation genes delineates a nine-gene prognostic signature for HGSOC and confirms hub-gene overexpression in cisplatin-resistant cells, nominating therapeutic targets.
Yan-Min Zhang, Si-Huang Wu, Hui-Zhu Lin et al.· Translational Oncology· 0 citations
The risk model based on FN1 and TIMP1 are identified as pivotal MacPCD-related prognostic genes in GBM, offering a reliable tool for clinical prognosis and paving the way for personalized immunotherapy strategies.
A reproducible transcriptional score associated with features of the tumor immune microenvironment and prognosis in gastric cancer, GC-MIS is a reproducible transcriptional score that reflects tumor–myeloid interaction programs and may serve as a prognostic biomarker.
Xing-Hua Zhang, Can Sun, Xi Zhang· BMC Cancer· 0 citations
Re-analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data characterizes the diverse cell subtypes within the tumor and microenvironment of TNBC, supporting a luminal progenitor origin for the cancer and providing clues as to the factors involved in progression of the disease.
G. Davidson, V. Debien, Tom Sexton· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.