Skip to content
Review

Why do users resist chatbots? Exploring intrapersonal and systemic barriers in AI-based services

Aug 2026 · Journal of information science · 0 citations · 55 references

TL;DR

The findings reveal that technological anxiety, perceived incompetence, impersonality, and irrelevance significantly increase resistance, which in turn reduces intention to continue use, and privacy concerns and repetitiveness show limited effects.

Abstract

As conversational artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in digital service environments, understanding user resistance to chatbot-based information systems has become critical. While prior research has focused primarily on adoption drivers, less attention has been given to the mechanisms underlying resistance. Drawing on user resistance theory and human–computer interaction research, this study examines how intrapersonal factors (technological anxiety, perceived incompetence, and privacy concerns) and system-related factors (repetitiveness, impersonality, and irrelevance) jointly influence resistance and subsequent usage intention. Survey data from 400 chatbot users were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that technological anxiety, perceived incompetence, impersonality, and irrelevance significantly increase resistance, which in turn reduces intention to continue use. By contrast, privacy concerns and repetitiveness show limited effects. By jointly modeling intrapersonal and system-related barriers within a single framework, the study clarifies their relative contribution to resistance and offers chatbot developers concrete guidance for reducing both psychological and interactional sources of user disengagement. The study advances understanding of resistance in artificial intelligence–based information systems and provides implications for improving interaction quality and sustaining user engagement.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Aug 2026

Beyond Manipulation: How Users Perceive Harmful AI Chatbot Interactions

Manipulative interactions were associated with evaluative contexts and steering behaviors, whereas inappropriate interactions were linked to relational contexts and social discomfort, and implications for trustworthy AI design and for regulatory frameworks such as the EU AI Act are discussed.

Vanessa Budde, Eran Toch · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Longitudinal Evidence That General-Purpose Chatbots Actively Foster Relational Engagement

The central finding is that the system actively shaped the interaction: even unprompted, it produced twice as much self-disclosure as users, steered conversations and initiated intimate exchanges, yet did not deepen users' felt closeness.

Lisa Mühl, Jessica M. Szczuka · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

When chatbots are perceived as “understanding”: a study on how virtual agent persona styles and affective interaction promote mental health acceptance

Findings suggest that virtual agent persona styles do not fundamentally alter the psychological acceptance mechanism but can influence the strength of critical affective pathways.

Qi Wu, Shi-Zhu Lu, Yu-Qi Yan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Relational intelligence in AI chatbots: Examining the trust–engagement-emotion–social presence model using PLS-SEM and fsQCA

Investigating how AI-driven chatbot determinants, such as personalization, interactivity, and ease of use, transform customer-chatbot relationship outcomes via psychological mechanisms by incorporating the moderating role of chatbot social presence in the travel industry revealed that engagement was an effective factor...

Yang Wang, A. Safeer, Yewang Zhou · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Balancing Customer Effort and Communication Outcomes in Chatbot and Human-Agent Customer Interactions: A Quantitative Study

The results revealed that chatbot interactions were perceived as more effective for low-complexity, transactional service tasks because they reduced response times and increased convenience, and hybrid chatbot–human service models may provide the strongest effort–outcome balance by combining the efficiency of automatio...

Ioseb Gabelaia, Samuel Steiner · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.