By linking early genetic probability with brain-behavioral trajectories, PROGRESS advances understanding of autism-related differences before clinical diagnosis and provides an empirically grounded foundation for ethical genomic newborn screening and optimized early developmental monitoring and intervention.
Abstract
Background
Autism is most often diagnosed after the age of 3, despite evidence that neurodevelopmental differences emerge within the first 2 years of life and that genetic and familial risk can be identified at birth.
Methods
Established in September 2022 (anticipated duration of 5-7 years), the Prospective Genetic Risk Evaluation and Assessment (PROGRESS) in Autism Center is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study designed to characterize early developmental trajectories associated with autism and evaluate the impact of providing genetic information to families.
Results
Infants who undergo genomic newborn screening and enroll in PROGRESS are followed from 3 to 24 months of age and categorized into three groups: identified genetic probability (IGP), familial likelihood without identified genetic probability (Baby Siblings), and no identified genetic probability (NGP). Assessments include electroencephalography, electrocardiography, auditory, eye tracking, developmental testing, caregiver-infant interaction, and caregiver-reported measures. Autism screening is conducted at 18 months, with comprehensive diagnostic evaluation at 24 months. Caregiver psychosocial experiences of receiving early genetic information are assessed through surveys and interviews.
Conclusion
By integrating genomic probability with early neurobehavioral development and family experiences, PROGRESS provides a framework to inform ethical genomic screening, developmental monitoring, and timely access to early intervention supported by a family navigator.
IMPACT
This study presents the rationale and methods of the ongoing Prospective Genetic Risk Evaluation and Assessment (PROGRESS) in Autism Center at Columbia University, which began in September 2022 (anticipated duration of 5-7 years). PROGRESS is a prospective longitudinal cohort assessing infants with identified genetic probability, familial likelihood, or no identified genetic probability for autism from 3 to 24 months of age. By linking early genetic probability with brain-behavioral trajectories, PROGRESS advances understanding of autism-related differences before clinical diagnosis and provides an empirically grounded foundation for ethical genomic newborn screening and optimized early developmental monitoring and intervention.
The molecular signatures identified in regASD suggest involvement of immune and synaptic pathways, highlighting the need for further targeted research to clarify their potential therapeutic implications for this subgroup of children with ASD.
A. Maruani, Emma Delclaud, Paul Bruzeau et al.· Autism Research· 0 citations
Early screening for children with these risk factors can facilitate early intervention for those at most risk for poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes, and can facilitate early intervention for those at most risk for poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Meg Stone-Heaberlin, Allison D Blackburn, Leanne Tamm et al.· Journal of Perinatology· 0 citations
Current and emerging diagnostic and management approaches to ASD are examined, indicating that extensive family involvement and coordinated, interdisciplinary care lead to improved long-term outcomes.
D. I. Khan, Sana Jameel· Current Psychiatry Research...· 0 citations
It is argued that future early ASD detection systems should be developed as clinician-supervised decision-support tools rather than autonomous diagnostic instruments.
Wenhao Luo, Z. Yin, Jianbiao Dai· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Estimating how common autism is among children aged 2 to 9 years in Northern Uganda, to identify co-occurring neurodevelopmental conditions, and to explore factors that may increase likelihood of autism are carried out.
Ouma Simple, E. Estlin, Kennedy Kosko Okello et al.· Autism· 1 citation
This critical narrative review examines early autism identification as a pathway problem rather than as a single testing event and argues that early autism identification should be evaluated through linked quality measures: response to concern, repeated surveillance following negative or ambiguous screening, referral c...
R. Kurmashev, Mavile Karaieva· Pediatric Investigation· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.