Results show that validated social trajectories provide actionable signals for repairing LLM agent teams.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed as teams, yet they fail in characteristically social ways: information holders stay silent, dominant speakers anchor groups on wrong answers, and norm violations go unsanctioned. We present Agent Sociodrama, a framework for modeling and validating evolving social dynamics in LLM agent teams. Under fixed personas, agents'emotional states and directed, asymmetric relationships are updated every round by a unified external LLM judge and shape their subsequent interactions. Across six LLM backbones and five social scenarios, we assess social fidelity through classical social-theory patterns and agreement with human judgments. The resulting trajectories exhibit structured social patterns and model-specific differences. We then introduce Trajectory-Guided Persona Recasting (TPR), which diagnoses group-dynamic failures from interaction transcripts and social trajectories and recasts agent personas before rerunning the task. Across four collaborative benchmarks, TPR improves performance from both heterogeneous and randomly initialized agent persona compositions, yielding up to 83.3%p of accuracy improvement over the initial casting. On representative distributed-information cooperation and mixed-motive bargaining tasks, we outperform SOTOPIA and AgentVerse in three of four comparisons, by up to 37.5%p in Pareto rate. These results show that validated social trajectories provide actionable signals for repairing LLM agent teams.
A strategic game arena is introduced that situates LLM agents in social deduction scenarios inspired by Among Us, requiring theory of mind, deception detection, and cooperative deliberation under uncertainty, and motivates architectural changes for virtual agents that must cooperate with humans.
Kevin Kurian, Kevin Scroggins, Emmanuel Dorley et al.· Proceedings of the 26th ACM...· 0 citations
A World Values Survey-grounded simulation framework where culturally diverse agents with different communication styles engage in longitudinal, value-laden discussions suggests that current LLM agents can generate plausible conversations, but remain limited proxies for representing and preserving diverse human value pr...
Farah Atif, Sougata Saha, Monojit Choudhury· Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM...· 0 citations
Social media platforms mediate how billions form opinions and engage with public discourse. As autonomous AI agents increasingly participate in these spaces, understanding their behavioral fidelity becomes critical for platform governance and democratic resilience. Previous work demonstrates that LLM-powered agents can...
Ljubiša Bojić, Alexander Felfernig, Bojana M. Dinić et al.· Scientific Reports· 1 citation
It is found that competence dominates human-directed evaluations, while many \textit{other} attributions describe humans as epistemic, cultural, or embodied subjects, and suggest that bias in agent societies should be studied not only as isolated model output, but also as a discourse process.
Study of mixed human-AI groups in a collaborative description game provides evidence that AI composition can shape the emergence, content, and perceived legitimacy of group norms, making agent proportion and transparency important design variables for human-AI systems.
Generative Social Simulation (GSS) leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to create sophisticated personas that define agents with demographics, emotions, and political opinions. While prior work shows that personas compress outputs into stereotypical caricatures, there is no comprehensive study of how these caricature...
Dimitris Michailidis, Petter Törnberg, Fernando P. Santos· 0 citations