Reliability and readability of AI chatbot responses to patient questions about robot-assisted radical cystectomy

Comparative performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in patient education for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality, transparency and readability

Although some models provided comparatively stronger patient education, none consistently produced sufficiently accessible information on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, and these tools may supplement, but should not replace, individualized counseling by urologists and multidisciplinary prostate cancer teams.

ChatGPT as a source of surgical information: Evaluation of responses to patient questions on hallux rigidus fusion

ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-5 provide generally satisfactory yet non-comprehensive, limited-quality information at a level above tenth-grade regarding hallux rigidus fusion surgery.

Quality, transparency, and readability of AI chatbot responses for patient counseling in robot-assisted colorectal cancer resection: a cross-sectional evaluation

AI chatbots furnish moderately good-quality counseling for RACR, yet persistent gaps in transparency and readability render them inadequate as standalone patient education tools.

Quality and readability of AI Chatbot responses to frequently asked questions from patients undergoing progressive collapsing foot deformity surgery: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.

AI chatbots produce generally accurate baseline information on PCFD surgery, with Perplexity showing significantly higher expert-rated accuracy and clarity than the other platforms-contrary to the hypothesis of comparable accuracy-while readability remains uniformly inadequate for all platforms, as hypothesized.

Guideline-based evaluation of large language models for patient counselling before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: accuracy, safety, and readability

Quality of AI-Generated Patient Education for Pre- and Post-Operative Tracheostomy Care.

AI chatbots can generate accurate and comprehensive responses to common tracheostomy care questions, demonstrating potential to support patient education, but they continue to lack guaranteed, verifiable sourcing.