The SN60WF IOL model demonstrated better refractive prediction accuracy than the Softec model, and Formula selection according to IOL model may help improve refractive outcomes in eyes with shallow ACDs.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated whether the refractive prediction accuracy of conventional and new-generation intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas differs between two single-piece acrylic IOL models in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD). Methods: In total, 100 eyes implanted with Softec HD IOLs (Lenstec) and 102 eyes implanted with SN60WF IOLs (Alcon) were included. All eyes had an ACD of ≤3.0 mm. The prediction error (PE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of 11 formulas, with and without optimized constants, were evaluated, including seven new-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II [BUII], Cooke K6 [K6], EVO 2.0, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Pearl-DGS) and four conventional formulas (Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T). Results: The new-generation formulas (except K6) showed myopic PEs ranging from −0.108 to −0.181 D in the Softec group; most of these formulas (except Pearl-DGS and Hoffer QST) showed hyperopic PEs ranging from 0.120 to 0.310 D in the SN60WF group. Both before and after optimization, Hill-RBF 3.0 and Pearl-DGS yielded the lowest MAEs in the Softec and SN60WF groups, respectively. Before optimization, most formulas had MAEs > 0.43 D in the Softec group and <0.38 D in the SN60WF group; after optimization, the MAEs were 0.408–0.479 D and 0.334–0.377 D, respectively. Conclusions: The new-generation formulas with ULIB constants showed myopic and hyperopic PEs in the Softec and SN60WF groups, respectively. The SN60WF IOL model demonstrated better refractive prediction accuracy than the Softec model. Formula selection according to IOL model may help improve refractive outcomes in eyes with shallow ACDs.
Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae incorporating posterior corneal power vs traditional keratometry in post-laser vision correction (LVC) eyes undergoing cataract surgery. Patients and Methods This multicenter study (7 sites) combined retrospective chart review and pro...
Hasan Alsetri, Mitchell P. Weikert, Nicole R. Fram et al.· Clinical Ophthalmology· 0 citations
ICL implantation alters biometric measurements and theoretically predicted Δ-pSEQ; although these changes are statistically significant, their clinical significance is negligible.
Wan-Ping Zhang, Yong Qu, An-Peng Pan et al.· Acta ophthalmologica· 0 citations
PURPOSE
To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of 11 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in cataract patients with short axial length (AL), and to further evaluate the predictive performance of these formulas across different AL and keratometry (Km) subgroups.
METHODS
This multicenter retrospecti...
Ting-Ting Pan, Xue Ding, Wei-Kang Bi et al.· Graefe's archive for clinica...· 0 citations
Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the SRK/T and Barrett Universal II intraocular lens (IOL) power-calculation formulas in uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective comparative study included 200 eyes of 200 patients undergoing cataract surgery, i...
Pooja Srinivasan, Sozhamadevi Subramanian, S. Elavarasan et al.· Indian Journal of Clinical a...· 0 citations
Lenstar LS 900 optical biometry offers high predictive accuracy and efficient workflow in IOL power calculation in patients with age-related cataract in Iraqi patients having cataract surgery.
Omar Mahmood, Y. Al-Khafaji, Faraidoon Mohammad· Babcock University Medical J...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.