Aug 2026· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2· 0 citations· 14 references
TL;DR
The proposed Chem-R, a general Chemical Reasoning model designed to emulate the deliberative processes of chemists, achieves state-of-the-art performance on comprehensive benchmarks, surpassing leading LLMs, including Gemini-3-Pro and Kimi-k2.5.
Abstract
Despite the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in chemical discovery, current LLMs still lack fundamental chemical domain knowledge, produce incoherent reasoning trajectories, and exhibit suboptimal performance across diverse chemical tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Chem-R, a general Chemical Reasoning model designed to emulate the deliberative processes of chemists. To build advanced reasoning capabilities of Chem-R, we design a three-phase training framework, including: 1) Chemical Foundation Training (CFT), which establishes core chemical knowledge. 2) Chemical Reasoning Protocol (CRP) Distillation, incorporating structured, expert-like reasoning traces to guide systematic and reliable problem solving. 3) Chemical Multi-Task Optimization (CMO) that optimizes the model for generalizable capabilities across diverse molecular- and reaction-level tasks. This structured pipeline enables Chem-R to achieve state-of-the-art performance on comprehensive benchmarks, surpassing leading LLMs, including Gemini-3-Pro and Kimi-k2.5, by up to 19% on molecular tasks and 40% on reaction tasks. Meanwhile, Chem-R also consistently outperforms existing chemical foundation models across both molecular and reaction level tasks. These results demonstrate Chem-R's superior generalization, interpretability, and potential as a foundation for next-generation AI-driven chemical discovery. The code and model are available at https://github.com/davidweidawang/Chem-R.
This work introduces Top-K prompting as a robust training and inference paradigm to better capture diverse, plausible reaction predictions and establishes Top-K, plausibility-aware training as a practical new direction for robust future LLM-based synthesis planning.
B. Zagribelnyy, Ivan D. Ilin, N. Bondarev et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces ChemDIRT (Diversified Instruction, Representation, and Task Benchmark), a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to assess the robustness of chemical reasoning in LLMs and benchmark a diverse set of open- and closed-source LLMs.
Eric Inae, Tim Gunn, Chris Bond et al.· 0 citations
A novel, large-scale reasoning dataset of reaction mechanisms, and the FukuyamaBench, a difficult benchmark derived from Fukuyama's Advanced Organic Reaction Mechanism book, to rigorously evaluate model performance on hierarchical mechanism reasoning, demonstrate that mechanism-aware training substantially enhances chemical reasoning in language models.
Xingyu Dang, Haocheng Tang, Junmei Wang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A task-adaptive large reasoning model that integrates chemical knowledge through a synergistic multispecialist architecture, chain-of-thought supervision, and molecule-informed reinforcement learning is presented, demonstrating a versatile multitask framework for knowledge-guided molecular reasoning and design.
Pengfei Liu, Shuang Ge, Xiaobo Wang et al.· Journal of Physical Chemistr...· 0 citations
Onepot-Bench 0 is introduced, a proprietary benchmark suite for evaluating language models on synthetic chemistry capabilities relevant to wet-lab execution and probes basic competency, reliability, and deeper knowledge, all skills which are required for reliable performance in the lab.
Brandon Wang, Andrei S. Tyrin, Daniil A. Boiko· 0 citations
Chemistry navigates an immense molecular space using compact, transferable knowledge structures that are neither strict physical laws nor merely qualitative intuition. We argue that this approach is best understood as compression: deliberate, lossy, and interpretable reductions of chemical details that generalize surprisingly well across molecules, reactions, and domains. Machine learning (ML) performs a different kind of compression, optimizing against training objectives rather than chemical judgment. The result is models that excel within their training domains but can fail outside them in ways that are difficult to diagnose, often without providing the mechanistic insight that makes chemical knowledge valuable and transferable. This difference defines an epistemic gap that is the central challenge for artificial intelligence (AI) in chemistry. Physics-based AI systems offer a partial path forward, but we believe this gap will persist for the foreseeable future with important consequences for how chemistry is practiced and taught.
Oliver Steinbock, Wen Zhu, Wei Yang et al.· Chemistry· 0 citations