Skip to content
Preprint

G-MARK: Grounded Multi-Agent Reasoning for Cooperative Driving via Knowledge Graphs

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

G-MARK is proposed, a grounded multi-agent reasoning framework that converts cooperative object-centric observations into explicit provenance-aware knowledge graphs (KGs) that preserve object hypotheses together with their source attribution, ego-versus-partner visibility, uncertainty, conflicts, spatial relations, and planning-relevant context.

Abstract

Autonomous driving systems must operate under partial observability, where safety-critical objects may be occluded or visible only to neighboring connected vehicles. Vehicle-to-vehicle cooperation can reduce this uncertainty, but existing cooperative driving methods often compress multi-agent evidence into latent features or hidden multimodal states. As a result, they obscure which agent observed each object, whether the object is visible to the ego vehicle, and how conflicting evidence affects downstream decisions. We propose G-MARK, a grounded multi-agent reasoning framework that converts cooperative object-centric observations into explicit provenance-aware knowledge graphs (KGs). The resulting KGs preserve object hypotheses together with their source attribution, ego-versus-partner visibility, uncertainty, conflicts, spatial relations, and planning-relevant context. G-MARK then derives a shared feature representation from these KGs, enabling lightweight task heads to support object reasoning, motion prediction, control selection, and trajectory forecasting. Compared with the state-of-the-art baseline, GMARK improves occlusion reasoning accuracy by 42.2%, reduces control-selection error by 13.1%, and achieves comparable trajectory-planning accuracy with a 25.6x smaller structured communication payload. Our code is available at https://github.com/bhavyagupta98/g-mark.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

DH-VLM: Dual-Horizon Cooperative Latent Reasoning for Autonomous Driving

DH-VLM is proposed, a dual-horizon cooperative latent reasoning framework that enables asymmetric semantic cooperation between the infrastructure and ego vehicle and achieves state-of-the-art planning performance, outperforming the previous state of the art.

Ziyi Song, Chen Xia, Hang Yu et al. · 2 citations
2026

EdgePlanner: An Edge-Assisted Agentic Framework for Autonomous Vehicle Trajectory Planning via V2X Collaboration

Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) techniques expand the capability boundaries of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). However, deploying V2X-enabled end-to-end autonomous driving (E2E-AD) systems still faces a trade-off between sharing high-resolution perception features and V2X communication bandwidth constraints. Furt...

Han Jiang, Zi-Yang Yan, Zechang Ye et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Unified Semantic Reasoning and Planning for Autonomous Driving

A single Triplet Ontological Semantic Model (TOSM) representation is carried across the stack by carrying a single Triplet Ontological Semantic Model (TOSM) representation across the stack so that reasoning, planning, and optimization share one interpretable representation.

Ye-Chan An, Junhyeon Choi, Jeong-Won Pyo et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

GRAVA: Grounded Reasoning-to-Action Representation and Learning for Autonomous Driving

GRAVA-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance among purely autoregressive driving models on the full NAVSIM benchmark, and results show the benefit of preserving action-relevant physical evidence from grounded reasoning through executable action generation.

Xiao Liu, Hao-Yu Li, Jiang-Hao Leng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

CASCADE: A Spatio-Temporal-Causal Reasoning Representation and Dataset for Driving

This work introduces CASCADE (Causal Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Driving Environments), a structured scene representation for reasoning in driving scenes and a human-annotated dataset built on it that provides the reference for benchmarking the reasoning abilities of Physical AI models, and verifying the quality of aut...

Jenny Schmalfuss, Despoina Paschalidou, Simon Gerstenecker et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.