Skip to content
Open access

Effectiveness of Active Vision Therapy in Children with Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia

Jul 2026 · Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research · 0 citations · 34 references

TL;DR

Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectivity of vision therapy plus patching versus patching combined with placebo therapy in bilateral refractive amblyopia.Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, children with bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled. Monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 0.3 logMAR (20/40) to 0.6 logMAR (20/80) in both eyes, and visual acuity (VA) difference was less than 0.2 logMAR between the eyes. The experimental group received patching plus in-office vision therapy with Vision Therapy System 4 (VTS4), including accommodation, stereopsis, ocular movements, and visual memory skills, while the control group received patching plus in-office placebo therapy. The primary outcome measure was BCVA, and the secondary outcomes were stereo acuity, and accommodative facility measured pre- and post-therapy.Results: Forty children aged 5 to 8 were included. After 4 months of therapy, the mean VA improvement was 0.23 ± 0.08 logMAR [2.3 line] (P < 0.001) in the experimental group and 0.09 ± 0.06 logMAR [0.09 line] (P < 0.001) in the control group. The difference in VA improvement between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Post-therapy, the improvements in Randot stereoacuity and in monocular and binocular accommodative facilities were statistically significant between the experimental and the control groups (P = 0 .013, P = 0.005, P = 0.002, respectively).Conclusion: Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Effect of active vision therapy on contrast sensitivity in bilateral amblyopia.

Active vision therapy leads to significant and accelerates improvements in CS among children with bilateral refractive amblyopia and demonstrates a rate of change in monocular CS of 0.05 during follow-up time.

Saeed Rahmani, Saeedeh Hoseinmenni, C. Dehghani et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Effect of vision therapy on children and adults with amblyopia who showed plateaued improvement after occlusion therapy.

Vision therapy can produce clinically meaningful and durable visual improvements in amblyopic patients who no longer respond to occlusion alone, and supports extending amblyopia treatment into adolescence and adulthood, while emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on the etiology of amblyopia and age.

Hassan Hashemi, Alireza Jamali, E. Jafarzadehpur et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Real-world effectiveness of a binocular, dual-mechanism therapy in severe amblyopia: analysis from the PUPiL Registry.

Luminopia demonstrated significant improvements in Registry patients with severe amblyopia, particularly in treatment-naive patients, supporting its use as a viable treatment option that may address key limitations of traditional approaches.

Courtney L. Kraus, A. Godfrey, E. Gaier et al. · 1 citation
Aug 2026

Use of Dichoptic Therapy for Deprivation Amblyopia: A Single Institution Study.

Use of a dichoptic digital therapeutic device in the treatment and management of amblyopia holds exciting potential in deprivation amblyopia, although a percentage of patients with severe amblyopia did show modest improvement.

W. Sambhariya, Courtney L. Kraus · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A multinational randomized clinical trial of an eye-tracking-based binocular amblyopia treatment in children aged 4-9 years.

This randomized controlled study compared efficacy and safety of a novel binocular, eye-tracking-based home amblyopia treatment (CureSight) to patching. Three cohorts (China, Israel, U.S.) enrolled 197 children aged 4 to < 9 years with anisometropic, small-angle strabismic, or mixed-mechanism amblyopia at 15 academic/community sites (modified intent-to-treat); 156 completed ≥ 60% of prescribed dosage (per-protocol). CureSight: 90 min/day, 5 days/week for 16 weeks (120 h); patching: 2 h/day, 7 days/week (224 h). In the modified intent-to-treat dataset, visual acuity improvement from baseline to week 16 in the binocular group was noninferior to the patching group (0.028 logMAR; 95% CI - 0.007 to 0.063). In the per-protocol dataset, binocular treatment was superior to patching (0.04 logMAR; 95% CI 0.004 to 0.076). Improvement was significantly affected by baseline covariates of age, baseline vision levels, and previous amblyopia treatment. There was no significant between-group difference in the magnitude of improvement in stereoacuity in either dataset. Overall, CureSight was noninferior to patching in these amblyopia types and yielded better visual outcomes in children completing ≥ 60% dosage, supporting binocular therapy as an additional first-line option.

O. Yehezkel, T. Wygnanski-Jaffe, B. Kushner et al. · 0 citations
2026

Treatment of Ametropic Amblyopia and the Significance of Cycloplegia in Childhood.

The effect of full cycloplegic spectacle correction on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), interocular difference in BCVA, and the presence of stereopsis in children previously treated for ametropic amblyopia in children previously diagnosed and treated for amblyopia is evaluated.

Matej Gajdoš, Zuzana Tóthová, Karolína Benca-Kapitánová et al. · 0 citations