Skip to content
Review Open access

EP 254 ChatGTP in Undergraduate Medical Education- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aug 2026 · British Journal of Surgery · Vol 113 · 0 citations

TL;DR

ChatGPT-assisted teaching significantly improves learning outcomes in undergraduate medical students compared with traditional teaching, however, the very high heterogeneity and potential publication bias necessitate cautious interpretation, and further high-quality trials are required to define optimal educational implementation.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded Gen-Z, with ChatGPT emerging as an educational tool. Its application has expanded rapidly across disciplines, including medical education, where it is widely used. Robust evidence synthesising its effectiveness in undergraduate medical education is still evolving. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ChatGPT-assisted teaching compared with traditional educational methods in undergraduate medical students. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Independent searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, Ovid full-text journals, and the Cochrane Library using the terms “ChatGPT” and “medical education” in titles and abstracts until 25th September 2025. Randomised controlled trials involving undergraduate medical students were included. The intervention was ChatGPT-assisted teaching, with traditional classroom and bedside teaching as the comparator. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 with a random-effects model. Six randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, comprising 361 undergraduate medical students (182 in the ChatGPT group and 179 in the traditional teaching group). ChatGPT-assisted learning was associated with significantly higher assessment scores, with a pooled mean difference of 6.21 points in favour of ChatGPT (95% CI 2.03–10.39, p = 0.004). Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 98%), indicating marked variability between studies. ChatGPT-assisted teaching significantly improves learning outcomes in undergraduate medical students compared with traditional teaching. However, the very high heterogeneity and potential publication bias necessitate cautious interpretation, and further high-quality trials are required to define optimal educational implementation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

The Forgotten Student—Generative AI Use in Medical Education and the Technology-Integrated Educational Design (TIED) Road Map: Scoping Review

Abstract Background The growing impact of generative AI (GenAI) on medical education has given rise to many reviews discussing AI literacy, trustworthiness, potential uses, and institutional or faculty benefits. However, there has been surprisingly little review-level attention to its impact on students and learning. O...

Anita Pieńkowska, Olivia Ng, Jian-Lin Hou et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Team-based learning and its impact on clinical reasoning in medical education: A review and the unexplored role of artificial intelligence

Team-based learning (TBL) is widely adopted in medical education to promote active learning, collaboration, and improved clinical reasoning. Although digital platforms are increasingly integrated into TBL, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in this context remains largely theoretical. We systematically reviewed em...

B. H. Shrikrishna, G. Deepa · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

A comparative evaluation of ChatGPT-assisted and traditional methods of teaching diagnostic assessments to medical students

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought new opportunities and challenges to the ever-evolving field of medical education. However, the specific impact of AI on the teaching of diagnostic assessments to medical students requires further investigation. The purpose of this study was to...

Hua Xu, Yu Sun, Zhi-Wen Mo et al. · 0 citations
Meta-analysis Open access Jan 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Practice Education: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Objective To systematically evaluate the application effect of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in nursing practice courses and to provide evidence‐based guidance for the intelligent reform of nursing education. Methods Computerized searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library,...

Jing-Ting Wang, Ming-Xi Kuang, Jia-Yuan Chen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Quality assessment of ChatGPT-generated medical information for healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic reviewv

ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based language model, has gained popularity in medicine, although concerns remain regarding the accuracy and clinical applicability of its generated content. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, EBSCO, and Scopus da...

F. M. Tkaczyk, Joanna Gotlib-Małkowska, Z. Siudak · 0 citations
Review

Gamification Approaches to Improve Learning Outcomes among Medical Students

Greater benefits were observed in clinically oriented and skill-based learning activities, although substantial heterogeneity was identified across studies, and Gamification is a promising educational strategy in medical education.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.