Aug 2026· Frontiers in Medicine· Vol 13· 1 citation· 158 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This narrative review summarizes the molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical relevance of Lp(a), and critically examines current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing Lp(a)-mediated cardiovascular risk.
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has emerged as a major, genetically determined, contributor to residual cardiovascular risk. Accumulating evidence from epidemiological studies, human genetics, and Mendelian randomization has unequivocally established elevated Lp(a) as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Lp(a) consists of a low-density lipoprotein-like particle in which apolipoprotein(a) is covalently linked to apolipoprotein B100. This unique structure confers proatherogenic, pro-inflammatory, and antifibrinolytic properties, largely mediated by oxidized phospholipids and the structural homology of apolipoprotein(a) with plasminogen. Circulating Lp(a) concentrations are genetically determined and remain relatively stable throughout life with minimal influence from lifestyle interventions. Conventional lipid-lowering therapies have little or no meaningful effect on circulating Lp(a) concentrations, leaving an important component of residual cardiovascular risk unaddressed. In contrast, RNA-based therapeutics targeting hepatic LPA expression have demonstrated reductions in circulating Lp(a) of up to 80–90% and are currently being evaluated in phase 3 cardiovascular outcome trials. This narrative review summarizes the molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical relevance of Lp(a), and critically examines current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing Lp(a)-mediated cardiovascular risk.
Lp(a) may soon shift from a “silent threat” to a precise, actionable target in cardiovascular prevention, according to a review of the current evidence, which highlights gaps in knowledge, and discusses emerging therapeutic strategies.
Michał Miszczak, P. Piwowarczyk, G. Sobieszek et al.· Biomedicines· 0 citations
Novel unapproved therapies, including an antisense oligonucleotide, small interfering RNAs, and an oral small molecule have demonstrated Lp(a) reductions of up to 99% and are being tested in ongoing cardiovascular outcomes trials to determine whether pharmacologic Lp(a) lowering translates into reduced cardiovascular e...
Yakubu Bene-Alhasan, V. Nambi, Layla A. Abushamat et al.· Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc...· 0 citations
Emerging evidence links Lp(a) to atrial fi brillation, broadening its clinical relevance and integrating Lp(a) testing into risk assessment and preparing for targeted therapies are critical steps in modern cardiovas-cular prevention.
L. Kopaleishvili, T. Chkhaidze, S. Ungiadze et al.· Bulgarian Cardiology· 0 citations
The Lp(a) treatment landscape has moved from basic science to an active late-stage clinical pipeline and positive outcomes from these CVOTs could lead to regulatory approvals and guideline updates affecting hundreds of millions of high-risk patients globally.
U. Ebubechukwu, O. Ugoala, Rameen Shahid et al.· Current Atherosclerosis Repo...· 0 citations
Overall, Lp(a) should be regarded as both a meaningful biomarker and a promising therapeutic target, although ongoing outcome trials are needed to determine whether selective Lp(a) lowering translates into clinical benefit across interventional cardiovascular settings.
F. M. Animati, Simone Proietti, Francesco Auletta et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.