Jul 2026· Journal of Clinical Medicine· Vol 15, pp. 5897· 0 citations· 184 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Overall, Lp(a) should be regarded as both a meaningful biomarker and a promising therapeutic target, although ongoing outcome trials are needed to determine whether selective Lp(a) lowering translates into clinical benefit across interventional cardiovascular settings.
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is increasingly recognized as a genetically determined and clinically relevant contributor to residual cardiovascular risk. Through pro-atherogenic, pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic, and pro-calcific mechanisms, Lp(a) appears to play a significant role in both coronary artery disease and aortic valve disease. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, elevated Lp(a) has been associated with worse long-term outcomes, including recurrent ischemic events, repeat revascularization, and in-stent restenosis, even in the setting of controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In parallel, experimental, genetic, and clinical data support a role for Lp(a) in the initiation and progression of calcific aortic stenosis, while its prognostic significance after transcatheter aortic valve interventions remains less clearly defined. Current guidelines now recognize Lp(a) as a relevant risk-enhancing factor, and emerging targeted therapies are achieving substantial reductions in circulating levels. Overall, Lp(a) should be regarded as both a meaningful biomarker and a promising therapeutic target, although ongoing outcome trials are needed to determine whether selective Lp(a) lowering translates into clinical benefit across interventional cardiovascular settings. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a single, comprehensive account of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in interventional cardiology, following this lipoprotein from its biology and pathophysiology through to its clinical impact and to the therapies that are now reaching the clinic, with a specific focus on the two most frequent catheter-based procedures in which it may carry prognostic weight: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). PCI and TAVI are deliberately addressed within the same review since they share a common upstream biology: Lp(a) contributes both to the atherosclerotic process that underlies coronary disease and to the calcific process that underlies aortic valve disease, and the corresponding patient populations overlap considerably in everyday interventional practice. Covering them together offers the interventional cardiologist a single, practical reference on how a patient with elevated Lp(a) may be approached in both scenarios.
Lp(a) may soon shift from a “silent threat” to a precise, actionable target in cardiovascular prevention, according to a review of the current evidence, which highlights gaps in knowledge, and discusses emerging therapeutic strategies.
Michał Miszczak, P. Piwowarczyk, G. Sobieszek et al.· Biomedicines· 0 citations
Experimental and translational data suggest that lipoprotein(a) exerts its effects early in the disease course, promoting valve inflammation and calcification before significant stenosis develops, raising the possibility that early lipoprotein(a)-lowering may modify disease progression, a hypothesis now being tested in...
L. Tokgozoglu, M. Kayıkçıoğlu· European Cardiology· 0 citations
This narrative review summarizes the molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical relevance of Lp(a), and critically examines current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing Lp(a)-mediated cardiovascular risk.
L. Granata, Simona Giubilato, Francesca Campanella et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 1 citation
Lp(a) should be considered a cardiovascular risk enhancer and a plausible causal contributor to calcific aortic valve disease, especially during earlier lipid-inflammatory and microcalcific phases.
Emerging evidence links Lp(a) to atrial fi brillation, broadening its clinical relevance and integrating Lp(a) testing into risk assessment and preparing for targeted therapies are critical steps in modern cardiovas-cular prevention.
L. Kopaleishvili, T. Chkhaidze, S. Ungiadze et al.· Bulgarian Cardiology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.