Five representative interfaces are implemented -- discrete state prompt, VLM prefix, action prefix, state expert, and feature modulation -- under matched implementation details, and evaluated on 45 atomic tasks spanning three task families plus 20 composite tasks.
Abstract
Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models almost universally take robot proprioceptive state as input, yet wire it in incompatible ways -- serialized into text prompts, projected into the vision-language prefix, or fed directly to the action expert -- and almost always as a single current frame. Three questions remain open: (1) whether, and on which tasks, current state actually improves closed-loop control; (2) how much state history helps, and whether its benefit reflects genuine temporal variation rather than added conditioning capacity; and (3) where state should enter the model -- the vision-language backbone or the action-generation module. We answer these questions through controlled experiments on a flow-matching VLA, fixing the backbone, training data, action representation, and evaluation protocol throughout. We implement five representative interfaces -- discrete state prompt, VLM prefix, action prefix, state expert, and feature modulation -- under matched implementation details, and evaluate them on 45 atomic tasks spanning three task families plus 20 composite tasks; we then sweep the state-history length from 1 to 96 frames to examine how historical state information affects model performance. The experiments yield systematic answers to all three questions, distilled into testable design principles for state-aware VLAs.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models can follow instructions and manipulate objects, but their performance often collapses out of distribution (OOD), when the scene, viewpoint, or object differs from training. Adapting to each new situation typically requires collecting more data and fine-tuning. We present StellaVLA, a framework that instead adapts at test time by conditioning on a single retrieved demonstration. The key idea is to move beyond imitating what an expert did and instead convey why: an automated offline pipeline converts each raw trajectory into a structured demonstration, e.g., a task plan, sub-goal descriptions, and verbalized 3D motion, at zero human-annotation cost. Provided as in-context guidance, this structured demonstration lets the policy reason about the task rather than mimic a pixel trajectory, which also makes it transferable across embodiments (real-robot, human-hand, or XR demonstrations). A parallel dual-training design internalizes this reasoning during training through a joint action-and-language objective, while inference uses the action expert alone, preserving real-time, high-frequency control with no added latency. On the VLA-Arena leaderboard(Aug 1, 2026), StellaVLA ranks first with an overall score of 0.63, versus 0.44 and 0.22 for the strong prior models ($\pi_{0.5}$ and LingBot-VLA), and it further leads on LIBERO with 98.8% average success rate and LIBERO-Plus with 85.1% success rate. Our real-robot benchmark demonstrates that StellaVLA can use both human/robot demos and human-to-robot (XR) demos as in-context structured demonstration to help VLA model adapt to OOD tasks.
Siyu Xu, Yunke Wang, Zijian Wang et al.· 0 citations
ALVA (Action- and Language-Conditioned Video Assessment), a trajectory evaluator that conditions its assessment on visual observations, the executed action sequence, and the natural language instruction, provides more effective feedback than the evaluated static image and embedding-based visual baselines and reduces the performance gap to a ground-truth oracle.
Hwanhee Kim, Jaehyun Jang, Seung-Min Cha et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
This work introduces HumanCLAW, an evaluation framework that decouples action decision-making from low-level execution in a vision-language model (VLM), and builds HumanCLAW-Bench, a database of 1,218 long-horizon, egocentric find-navigate-interact episodes across 41 indoor scenes.
Intention Distillation (INDI) is proposed, which distills behavior-level intent into the action decoder and organizes downstream predictions in an objective-dependent manner, and shows that action decoders benefit from explicitly modeling the semantic objective of the behavior they generate.
Test-time training (TTT) offers a lightweight way to adapt vision--language--action (VLA) policies from unlabeled deployment streams, but it remains difficult to use reliably in closed-loop manipulation. A shared adaptation space can mix incompatible task corrections, while an online update can alter subsequent actions before its consequences are known. We introduce a reliable TTT framework for VLA policies (VANE). VANE conditions prompt adaptation on the current vision--language context and learns from the future visual consequences of executed actions. Candidate updates are isolated from the live policy, evaluated on subsequent observations, and committed only when supported by future evidence, making adaptation selective and reversible. On SimplerEnv WidowX, VANE improves average success by $3.2$ percentage points over the corresponding TTT baseline. Results on Google Robot further show that deployment-time gains remain task- and embodiment-dependent. Together, these results demonstrate a constrained, evidence-based approach to adapting VLA policies during interaction.
H. Ji, Guoyang Xia, Luoyang Sun et al.· 0 citations
