Skip to content
Open access

Action- and Language-Conditioned Video Assessment for Embodied Control

Aug 2026 · Italian National Conference on Sensors · Vol 26, pp. 5046 · 0 citations · 51 references
Computer Science Medicine

TL;DR

ALVA (Action- and Language-Conditioned Video Assessment), a trajectory evaluator that conditions its assessment on visual observations, the executed action sequence, and the natural language instruction, provides more effective feedback than the evaluated static image and embedding-based visual baselines and reduces the performance gap to a ground-truth oracle.

Abstract

Vision-based embodied agents executing multi-step natural language instructions require feedback mechanisms that assess task progress over complete trajectories. Conventional approaches based on final-frame matching or continuous embedding similarity may overlook intermediate transitions that are necessary for determining whether an instruction has been completed. We propose ALVA (Action- and Language-Conditioned Video Assessment), a trajectory evaluator that conditions its assessment on visual observations, the executed action sequence, and the natural language instruction. The method uses a pre-trained vision-language model (VLM) in two stages: it first summarizes frame-to-frame visual transitions conditioned on the executed actions and then assesses the generated summary with respect to the instruction to produce a discrete trajectory-level progress score. In simulated 3D household environments, ALVA exhibits a conservative assessment pattern with near-zero false-positive rates. When used as terminal feedback for closed-loop policy optimization, it provides more effective feedback than the evaluated static image and embedding-based visual baselines and reduces the performance gap to a ground-truth oracle. These results support action- and language-conditioned video assessment as an interpretable feedback mechanism for the evaluated simulated embodied-control tasks.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Act with Intent: Distilling Behavior Intent for Vision-Language-Action Models

Intention Distillation (INDI) is proposed, which distills behavior-level intent into the action decoder and organizes downstream predictions in an objective-dependent manner, and shows that action decoders benefit from explicitly modeling the semantic objective of the behavior they generate.

Sangoh Lee, Sangwoo Mo, Wook-Shin Han · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

PGN: Design and Implementation of a Vision-Language Navigation System Based on Pangu Multimodal Foundation Model

Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an embodied agent to interpret a natural-language instruction and predict actions from temporally ordered visual observations. Adapting a multimodal large language model to VLN requires visual-language alignment, compact temporal inputs, action-space grounding, and stable training on the target hardware. This technical report presents PGN (Pangu Navigator), an offline VLN action-prediction system built on OpenPangu-7B. Training proceeds in two stages. First, PGMM aligns a frozen EVA-ViT-G/14 vision encoder with the frozen language backbone by training a Q-Former and a two-layer MLP projector. Second, PGN adapts the aligned model to expert navigation trajectories using five-observation windows, epoch-dependent temporal sampling, and a reasoning-then-action output format; this stage freezes the aligned visual pathway and updates three structural-token embeddings and LoRA adapters. The implementation combines mixed-precision computation, selective FP32 computation, and DeepSpeed ZeRO-2 on eight Ascend 910B NPUs. Under teacher-forced, open-loop evaluation on 500 held-out expert trajectories, V9 reports a 62.29% Normalized Action Match (NAM) and a 100.00% Non-empty Rate (NER). These metrics quantify offline expert-action alignment rather than closed-loop navigation success; evaluating error accumulation, path efficiency, and goal completion remains future work.

Li Xian, Mingxi Li, Yizheng Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

How Should Vision-Language-Action Models Use Proprioceptive State?

Five representative interfaces are implemented -- discrete state prompt, VLM prefix, action prefix, state expert, and feature modulation -- under matched implementation details, and evaluated on 45 atomic tasks spanning three task families plus 20 composite tasks.

Yiren Zhao, Ziyang Chen, Ziyang Rao et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Native Video-Action Pretraining for Generalizable Robot Control

The advent of video-action models offers a promising path for robot control. Nevertheless, we argue that repurposing video generative models designed for digital content creation is inherently inadequate for physical environments. To bridge this gap, we present LingBot-VA 2.0, a video-action foundation model built from the ground up for embodiment. Four core design principles showcase its evolution from LingBot-VA. (1) Departing from traditional reconstruction-focused VAEs, we introduce a semantic visual-action tokenizer, which aligns visual representations with both semantics and actions, improving instruction following and action precision in subsequent policy learning. (2) Given the strictly causal nature of temporal dynamics, we adopt a causal pretraining paradigm, training from scratch to circumvent the catastrophic forgetting that frequently occurs when adapting bidirectional architectures. (3) To meet the demands of high-frequency inference, our model employs a sparse MoE backbone, expanding model capacity without compromising efficiency. (4) Real-time closed-loop control is realized through an enhanced asynchronous inference scheme, which predicts future latents in parallel with action execution while re-grounding each rollout on the latest observation via learned forward dynamics. Real-world deployment validates LingBot-VA 2.0 as a robust foundation model, as evidenced by its few-shot generalization across complex manipulation tasks.

Qihang Zhang, Lin Li, Luyao Zhang et al. · 10 citations · ⚡3
Preprint Jul 2026

Vision-TL-Action: Neuro-Symbolic Trajectory Generation from Visual Observations and Temporal Logic

Temporal logic (TL) provides a compositional language for the formulation of long horizon robotic tasks, but existing TL-conditioned trajectory generators can sidestep perception-to-symbol binding by encoding exact object geometry in the task graph. We introduce \emph{Vision-TL-Action}, which generates action trajectories from multi-view images, a coordinate-free TL syntax graph, and the robot initial state. TL-node tokens and spatial visual tokens are fused through bidirectional cross-attention, and the resulting representation conditions a flow-matching trajectory generator. Visual tokens are augmented only with normalized image-plane locations and camera-view identifiers, while a training-only predicate-to-region objective encourages grounding to referenced objects. Consistent with prior work in this domain, we evaluate the model using Success@$K$, the fraction of tasks for which at least one of K sampled trajectories satisfies the TL specification. On Panda task, our model achieves 67.45% Success@1024, compared with 59.11% for the oracle-state baseline. On AntMaze task, it achieves 96.35% Success@256, comparable to the oracle result of 96.88%. Resolution and intervention studies show that spatial detail depends on semantic grounding and predicate identity affects both attention and performance. These results demonstrate a direct mapping from visual observations and structured TL goals to action trajectories without requiring object geometry at inference. Code is available at https://github.com/AricLau07/vision-tl-action.

Zezhi Liu, Zhiwei Zheng, Hanqian Luo et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

LM-X: Explainable Action Modeling with Progress, Event, and Uncertainty Prediction for Generalist Robot Manipulation

LM-X is introduced, which organizes prediction across task, event, and motor scales without claiming anatomical correspondence and shows that explicit multi-timescale predictive state can strengthen control while exposing interpretable internal estimates.

Jin Lou, Zhi Jing, A. Chen et al. · 0 citations