Skip to content
Review Open access

Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer immunotherapy: prognostic marker today, predictive tool tomorrow?

Aug 2026 · Frontiers in Immunology · Vol 17 · 0 citations · 102 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Circulating tumor DNA currently functions mainly as a prognostic and response-associated biomarker in lung cancer immunotherapy, while its predictive, decision-defining role remains an important but investigational objective.

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a minimally invasive biomarker for risk stratification and treatment-response assessment in lung cancer immunotherapy, but its routine use for treatment selection has not been established. This review critically evaluates evidence across neoadjuvant, adjuvant, consolidation after definitive chemoradiotherapy, and advanced/metastatic settings, with emphasis on serial sampling and on the distinction among prognostic, response-associated, and predictive roles. Across disease stages, baseline or post-definitive-treatment ctDNA detectability consistently identifies patients at increased risk of recurrence or death and is therefore principally prognostic. Early on-treatment decline or clearance frequently precedes radiographic change and is associated with pathological response, progression-free survival, and overall survival, supporting ctDNA as a response-associated biomarker. By contrast, evidence that ctDNA identifies differential benefit from a specific immunotherapy remains limited, because most analyses are single-arm and/or retrospective, formal treatment-by-biomarker interaction tests are uncommon, and prospective ctDNA-guided trials have not yet demonstrated clinical utility. Nevertheless, ctDNA dynamics provide a biologically and clinically coherent framework for future risk-adapted strategies, including enrichment of molecular residual disease-positive patients, early identification of resistance, and prospective testing of treatment escalation, de-escalation, or duration. Translation into routine care will require harmonized assays and sampling time points, improved sensitivity at low disease burden, control of clonal hematopoiesis, and randomized interventional validation. Thus, ctDNA currently functions mainly as a prognostic and response-associated biomarker in lung cancer immunotherapy, while its predictive, decision-defining role remains an important but investigational objective.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

The Dynamic Role of Liquid Biopsy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Emerging Opportunities and Clinical Challenges

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet predicting durable benefit and detecting resistance remain major challenges. As immunotherapy expands across disease stages, minimally invasive tools are increasingly needed to monitor response and inform treat...

T. D. Bazan Russo, V. Gristina, F. Pepe et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease in locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma: the BUTTERFLY study

Background Despite advances in perioperative and neoadjuvant strategies, patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers remain at high risk of recurrence after curative intent treatment. No validated biomarkers are available to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) or to guide post-operative risk-adapted manag...

A. Puccini, L. Paracchini, R. Alfieri et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

ctDNA in the Management of Resectable & Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions

Current professional guidance supports a cautious distinction between clinical validity and clinical utility: ctDNA can inform prognosis, counseling, and clinical-trial eligibility, but should not routinely replace standard surveillance or independently determine treatment escalation or de-escalation outside evidence-b...

H. Al-Shamsi, S. Rafii, S. Tirmazy et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Postoperative circulating tumor DNA in stage II colon cancer: biological rationale, clinical evidence, and unresolved challenges

Background Stage II colon cancer is clinically heterogeneous. Current clinicopathologic risk factors cannot accurately identify patients with residual disease after curative resection. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD), defined as micr...

Er-Hua Yang, Xue-Feng Wang, Jia-Jing Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease-guided adjuvant therapy in solid tumors: Current evidence, clinical trial frameworks, and future directions.

The postoperative management of resectable solid tumors depends on clinicopathological risk stratification. However, these static criteria often fail to identify occult minimal residual disease (MRD), resulting in suboptimal adjuvant treatment characterized by either overtreatment or undertreatment. Circulating tumor D...

Ming-Chi Ma, B. Xia, Qian Xu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Biomarkers in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: From Biological Association to Clinical Decision-Making

This review evaluates biomarkers at three clinical decision points: characterization of an indeterminate renal mass; recurrence-risk assessment and adjuvant treatment selection after nephrectomy; and first-line regimen selection in metastatic ccRCC.

Hadi Al Etri, Lea Al Zoghby, Mohamad Sadek Zoghbi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.