Skip to content

Sparse Readout Prism: Explaining Logit-Lens Scores in Features Instead of Tokens

Sep 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

Sarse Readout Prism (SRP), which decomposes the readout using only its weights and expresses any token logit or logit difference as a sum of contributions from sparse readout features, reveals readout features as a new unit of analysis for lens readings, exposing structure that token identities can obscure and enabling comparisons across tokens, contexts, layers, and lenses.

Abstract

A language model's prediction of its next token develops across layers, and lens methods track this process by decoding intermediate hidden states into tokens. But a lens reading reflects both the hidden state and the readout (the unembedding matrix) used to decode it. Many lenses are fit on a corpus, and we show that two lenses differing only in their fitting corpus can report different tokens for the same hidden states. We call this dependence corpus conditionality. To examine readout structure independently of the fitting corpus, we introduce Sparse Readout Prism (SRP), which decomposes the readout using only its weights and expresses any token logit or logit difference as a sum of contributions from sparse readout features. This reveals readout features as a new unit of analysis for lens readings, exposing structure that token identities can obscure and enabling comparisons across tokens, contexts, layers, and lenses. Replacing the original readout with SRP's sparse approximation reconstructs 8.9-17.3 percentage points more of the tested logit differences than the strongest of six baselines built on geometric relations among readout rows. Ablating features shifts logit differences in proportion to their SRP contributions. Although token readings vary with the fitting corpus, the dominant readout feature remains stable. Because SRP uses no corpus in its construction, it provides a control independent of the fitting corpus for lens analyses.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Concept Subspaces Compute Beyond the Logit Lens: A Weights-Only Test for Locating Representations Upstream of Readout

A concept subspace's effect on model behavior does not establish how it relates to the output readout. We introduce a two-sided geometric diagnostic that measures an extracted subspace's overlap with the dominant right-singular directions of the unembedding matrix, evaluated against output-oriented positive controls. G...

Ao-Jie Yuan, Z. Su, Hai-Yu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Readout Blindness: VLM Scores Miss the Spatial Direction Their Frozen Encoders Retain

CLIP-like vision-language models remain a cornerstone of multimodal systems, yet their scores stay near chance on directed spatial relations, such as whether one object is left of another. We call this failure readout blindness and analyze, theoretically and empirically, why deployed scores miss the direction: when sco...

Guang-Yuan Li, Tian-Ming Du, Yan Jiang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Learning Multimodal Embeddings with Evidence-Aligned Readout

Multimodal large language models can expose task-relevant evidence through generation, but producing useful evidence does not by itself determine how it enters a retrieval embedding. We study whether the semantic organization of that evidence can also specify where representations are read. To address this question, we...

Zi-Rong Chen, Fu-Da Ye, En-Jun Du et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.