Comparing of multiple computational approaches, including XGBoost, random forests, and support vector regression, showed that all methods successfully predicted survival outcomes, with Elastic Net offering the best performance and interpretability.
Abstract
The development and validation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer is limited by the availability of well-annotated datasets linking tumor molecular features to treatment response and survival outcomes. To address this need, we generated an extensive mouse models dataset comprised of 26 immunocompetent mammary tumor models spanning diverse genetic backgrounds, epithelial-mesenchymal states, the basal-luminal axis, and distinct immune microenvironments. For each model, survival was measured under no treatment, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, and RNA-sequencing was performed on baseline tumors and on 7-day on-treatment samples for both regimens. Baseline murine tumor gene expression features were used to train a machine learning Elastic Net model that predicted survival outcomes on multiple human breast cancer datasets with performance comparable to that of existing prognostic assays. Models trained for ICI benefit, using either the untreated or 7-day ICI treated samples, predicted ICI benefit on human ICI treated datasets, with the 7-day treated tumor model showing better performance. A predictor of carboplatin/paclitaxel response developed from the murine mammary tumor data performed well in mice but did not generalize to human chemotherapy cohorts. Finally, comparison of multiple computational approaches, including XGBoost, random forests, and support vector regression, showed that all methods successfully predicted survival outcomes, with Elastic Net offering the best performance and interpretability. These results indicate conserved cancer biology between mouse and human tumors for prognosis and ICI response and establish a large preclinical dataset with linked phenotypic and genomic data as a resource for biomarker discovery.
Distinct signatures in the adjuvant and metastatic settings suggest differences in T-cell programs associated with patient outcomes, and support further evaluation of pre-treatment circulating T-cell transcriptional profiles as predictors of ICI response and toxicity in melanoma.
Noah Lepola, C. Dravillas, Shannon Gray et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
A previously undescribed expression signature with potential predictive value for bevacizumab benefit is identified, and transcriptional heterogeneity of ovarian cancer that extends beyond current molecular classifications is revealed.
O. Zolotareva, K. Legler, O. Tsoy et al.· Genome Medicine· 0 citations
Analysis of transcriptional signatures of immune cell infiltration across three public transcriptomic datasets from patients with breast cancer suggests interactions between mast cells and non-malignant components of the breast cancer microenvironment, particularly fibroblasts, may shape disease progression and treatme...
A. Kirchmair, C. Galassi, E. García-Torralba et al.· Genes and Immunity· 0 citations
A novel AIGScore model with significant prognostic utility for PDAC is proposed, which may provide insights into TME characteristics and offer a potential framework for optimizing immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with PDAC.
Qing Chang, Qian Wang, Xiumei Jiang et al.· Visual Information Expert Wo...· 0 citations
The biological complexity and transcriptional diversity underlying CHL and its tumor microenvironment is highlighted, with an "oncogene-driven" transcriptional profile independent of previous treatment status, whereas responders showed an "inflammatory immune-scape" phenotype, offering insight into mechanisms of resist...
Leticia Hamana, M. Marques-Piubelli, Lu Wei et al.· Modern Pathology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.