Skip to content

Harness Continual Learning: Continual Adaptation Beyond Model Parameters

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Harness Continual Learning is formulated, a new continual learning paradigm in which the harness evolves around a frozen foundation model, and the resulting loss of earlier behavior as harness-level forgetting is defined.

Abstract

Continual learning has largely been model-centric, treating model parameters as the state that changes with sequential experience. Modern agents can also adapt through a harness of prompts, memories, tools, skills, and routing rules. Because these contents jointly shape later execution, a harness update can disrupt previously reliable behavior even when the model is frozen. This raises a new question: how can an agent continually improve its state outside the model while retaining behavior acquired earlier? We formulate Harness Continual Learning (HCL), a new continual learning paradigm in which the harness evolves around a frozen foundation model, and define the resulting loss of earlier behavior as harness-level forgetting. We instantiate HCL with four execution-facing components: the Task Interface, Experience Memory, Capability Map, and Adaptive Router. We further introduce guarded harness evolution to separate update generation from state commitment. A Continual Optimizer proposes candidate harnesses from post-execution feedback, and a Continual Evaluator commits the resulting candidate harness only after checking current improvement, historical retention, and validity. Experiments on textual reasoning, multimodal perception, and open-world interaction demonstrate capability accumulation and failure recovery, with relative gains exceeding 10% over corresponding baselines in multiple settings. Component ablations assess the contribution of each harness component, while controlled retention sweeps reveal measurable harness-level forgetting and show that the stability--plasticity trade-off can be explicitly adjusted.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Continual Learning in Transition

Anchored by this tri-axial framework, representative methods are systematically surveyed, the ongoing transition of continual learning is traced, and the key challenges, broader implications, and future directions arising from this paradigm shift are discussed.

Zhi-Yan Hou, Dan Zhang, Tao Feng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Recursive Harness Self-Improvement

Recursive Harness Self-Improvement is introduced, which represents the harness as a prompt-level specification of the agent loop and iteratively refines it using pairwise feedback over its own revision history, suggesting RHI as a practical algorithm for continual learning within the paradigm of model--harness co-evolution.

Hyunin Lee, Jinglue Xu, Jeffrey Seely et al. · 9 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Modern Continual Learning with Foundation Models, Evaluation Challenges, and Future Directions

This review provides a structured overview of major CL paradigms, including task-incremental, domain-incremental, class-incremental, online, multimodal, and federated CL, and examines the theoretical foundations of CL, particularly the stability–plasticity dilemma, catastrophic forgetting, transfer dynamics, and representation learning.

Zahid Ullah, Minki Hong, Jihie Kim · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Harness-R1: Learning to Edit Executable Runtime Harnesses from Agent Failure Trajectories

This work introduces Harness-R1, the first method, to the authors' knowledge, that makes failure-conditioned, lifecycle-wide editing of an existing executable runtime a learned capability, and post-trains a dedicated harness engineer with online reinforcement learning so that its edits are optimized for the realized task success they produce.

Shuai Shao, Kangning Zhang, Qingyao Li et al. · 6 citations · ⚡2
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning What to Remember and What to Internalize in LLM Self-Evolution via Adaptive Memory-Parameter Coordination

Large language model agents increasingly operate in dynamic environments where tool interfaces, APIs, and user requirements change after deployment. Existing self-evolution methods mainly follow two paradigms: harness-based approaches, which externalize feedback into editable memories or skills for rapid adaptation, and parameter-based approaches, which internalize experience into model parameters for deeper capability improvement. However, using either mechanism alone creates a trade-off between flexibility and performance. This paper asks how an agent can coordinate both channels to achieve robust self-evolution. We present COVE, a unified agent self-evolution framework that combines harness-based and parameter-based learning through task-aware routing, stage-aware scheduling, and knowledge optimization. Through this design, COVE treats self-evolution not as indiscriminate accumulation of experience, but as a coordinated process that matches tasks and knowledge types to appropriate learning mechanisms. Experiments across multiple task categories show that COVE outperforms single-channel evolution strategies, demonstrating more robust and efficient improvement under changing environments.

T. Ji, Zhenya Huang, Jiayu Liu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

When Does Continual Learning Require Learning

The results suggest that continual learning is not a single capability: different patterns of environmental change require fundamentally different update behaviors, determining when adaptation must be learned inside model weights and when it can be achieved through external scaffolding.

A. Harrington, Nayan Saxena, Michael Murphy et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1

Related blog posts