Aug 2026· Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research· Vol 1873, pp.
120205
· 0 citations· 64 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The obtained results suggest that the purpose of metabolic changes present in melanoma cells resistant to BRAF/MEK inhibitors is mainly to support the significantly increased invasiveness of these cells.
Abstract
Mutations in the BRAF (B-raf serine-threonine-protein kinase) gene occur in the majority of melanoma patients and significantly contribute to the progression of the disease. One of the most commonly used methods for treating melanoma is the use of BRAF and MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase) inhibitors. Unfortunately, resistance to treatment quickly develops in most patients. Therefore, an exhaustive understanding of the molecular basis of this resistance is crucial. We developed two melanoma cell lines resistant to vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor), which we previously characterized as highly invasive. Because cancer cells acquiring resistance may undergo significant metabolic changes, we investigated these processes in the obtained melanoma double-resistant cells. These cells exhibit increased glycolysis and elevated caveolin 1 levels, which contribute to their increased invasiveness. The mitochondria present in the peripheral region of the resistant cells are more functional than those present in the same region of control cells. Resistant cells also form more lipid droplets, but they are smaller than in control cells. Cholesterol ester level is reduced in resistant cells, while free cholesterol level is elevated. Moreover, resistant cells exhibit reduced lipolysis rate and expression of proteins regulating this process. In summary, the obtained results suggest that the purpose of metabolic changes present in melanoma cells resistant to BRAF/MEK inhibitors is mainly to support the significantly increased invasiveness of these cells.
The use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) for the targeted inhibition of the MAPK pathway represents a cornerstone of treatment for BRAFV600E-mutant melanoma. However, the rapid emergence of drug resistance remains a major clinical challenge. Mounting evidence indicates that therapy resistance is driven by both phenotypic pla...
M. F. Arbe, G. C. Glikin, L. Finocchiaro et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
This work unveils an unforeseen tumor-suppressing role for mTORC2 in the early adaptation phase of BRAF V600E melanoma cells to targeted therapy and identifies the NAMPT-ETC axis as a potential therapeutic vulnerability of low RICTOR tumors.
Ponzone Luca Prof, V. Calautti, Ssa Federica Cavallo· 0 citations
Combined BRAF/MEK and PSGL-1 targeting provides a durable anti-tumor response through enhanced functionality and a memory-like phenotype in CD8⁺ T cell subsets.
Metastatic melanoma remains highly lethal despite advances in immunotherapy and MAPK-targeted therapy. The Rac1P29S mutation, present in 4-9% of cutaneous melanomas, confers intrinsic resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Like other small GTPases, Rac1 lacks suitable pockets for small molecule inhibitor binding, motiv...
S. E. Simon, Tian-Nan Wang, Arsha Sreekumar et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Background/Aim: Advanced melanoma treatment remains debated, particularly in patients with B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600 mutations eligible for both immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Additional biomarkers are needed to improve treatment selection. Mutations of the te...
P. Marchese, I. Zannini, D. de Biase et al.· Anticancer Research· 0 citations
Findings show that multiple resistance-associated programs spanning signaling, cell survival, and metabolism share a dependency on eIF4A-dependent translation and provide a preclinical rationale to test whether adding eIF4A inhibition can prolong responses to MAPK-targeted therapy in melanoma.