Skip to content
Open access

AARD: A Risk-Aware Agentic AI Framework for Sequential Clinical Decision Support Using Large Language Models

2026 · ABH · pp. 143-151 · 0 citations · 9 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The proposed AARD framework offers a scalable and interpretable approach for combining agentic decision processes, LLM-based feature extraction, and risk-aware optimisation in health-care settings.

Abstract

: Modern healthcare systems require decision-support tools that can operate effectively in complex, uncertain, and data-rich environments. This paper proposes the Adaptive Agentic Risk-aware Decision (AARD) framework, a policy-based approach for modelling clinical decision-making as a sequential and adaptive process. The framework integrates structured clinical data, such as vital signs and laboratory measurements, with un-structured clinical text, where Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to extract contextual representations. AARD employs an agentic architecture in which decisions are generated through a learned policy and refined using a risk-aware mechanism. This allows the system to adapt actions over time based on evolving state representations while incorporating safety considerations into the decision process. A recursive learning mechanism enables continuous policy updates using observed state transitions, supporting consistent decision behaviour across sequential steps. The framework is evaluated using open-source healthcare datasets, with performance assessed through both predictive metrics and decision-oriented measures. The results indicate that integrating multimodal representations with risk-aware policy learning provides a structured approach to sequential decision support. Overall, the proposed framework offers a scalable and interpretable approach for combining agentic decision processes, LLM-based feature extraction, and risk-aware optimisation in health-care settings.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

A Time-Aware Multi-Agentic Framework for Proactive Clinical Trial Risk Monitoring and Adaptive Decision Optimization

This study addresses the research gap in designing an integrated, AI-driven clinical trial intelligence framework capable of time-aware data harmonization, proactive anomaly detection, and context-aware decision support by integrating predictive analytics with agentic decision mechanisms, time-aware validation strategi...

B. Jalender · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

On-premise medical AI agents for reliable clinical decision-making

A fully on-premise clinical agent that couples local operational control with a multi-perspective reliability framework to support selective autonomy is developed and evaluated, supporting a practical framework for institutionally governed clinical agents.

Li Zhang, G. Wölflein, Dyke Ferber et al. · 4 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

AI-Based Detection of Care Gaps in Electronic Health Records for Improved Clinical Decision Making Using Temporal, Semantic, and Guideline-Aware Learning

A guideline-aware artificial intelligence system that actively identifies gaps in care by combining structured EHR variables with unstructured clinical documents and tracking patient progress is proposed, making it safer and more effective in providing quality care to patients.

Vidhika, Manvi Chahar, S. Jaswal et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Review Sep 2026

Agentic AI in Medicine: Challenges for Responsible Development and the Case for Clinical Testing Harnesses.

It is argued that each of the four challenges facing responsible development is addressed by a clinical testing harness: a structured evaluation environment comprising scenario libraries built from clinical edge cases, full-trajectory observability, explicit escalation testing, and staged evidence thresholds tied to sc...

E. Waisberg, Joseph W. Guarnieri · 0 citations
Editorial Open access Aug 2026

Ask-Audit-Apply: A Framework for Clinical Reasoning with Artificial Intelligence.

Ask-Audit-Apply (AAA) is proposed as a clinician-facing framework for AI-supported clinical reasoning that specifies decision-level behavioral practices that may support education, supervision, and future research on safe AI integration across a range of CDS tools as these systems increasingly participate in clinical c...

Andrew Jenkins, Katherine W. Eisenberg, R. Ziegelstein · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Architectures of Learning-Driven Intelligence in Modern Medical Decision Environments

Medical decision environments today are becoming more modern through machine learning models based upon structured clinical data, but most deployments are still model-based and disjointed, avoiding system-level insights. Cross-valuation of static predictive baselines on the considered dataset of demographic characteris...

Rashmi Gowravaram, M. V. Narayana · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.