2026· Computer Science and Information Systems· pp. 34-34· 0 citations
TL;DR
This study investigates students’ acceptance of AI-assisted translation tools by proposing an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM-AI), which demonstrates greater explanatory power than the baseline TAM.
Abstract
This study investigates students’ acceptance of AI-assisted translation tools by proposing an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM-AI) for AIassisted translation learning contexts. Unlike prior additive approaches, the proposed model explains how translation-specific perceptions influence behavioral intention (BI) through underlying cognitive mechanisms. A survey was conducted among undergraduate translation students and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results indicate that perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) significantly predict BI. In addition, translation-specific factors influence technology acceptance indirectly: perceived translation quality operates through trust, feedback clarity through cognitive understanding, and cognitive load reduction through effort reduction. The TAM-AI model demonstrates greater explanatory power than the baseline TAM. These findings provide a deeper understanding of technology acceptance in AI-assisted learning environments and offer practical implications for the design of AI-assisted translation tools. Future studies with larger and more diverse samples are encouraged to further validate the proposed model.
The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education has created opportunities to enhance teaching and learning, highlighting the need to understand the factors influencing students' acceptance of these technologies. This study examined the acceptance of generative AI tools among junior and senior...
Kevin Caratiquit, Dr. Felix E. Arcilla Jr.· Psychology and Education: A...· 0 citations
It is suggested that the acceptance of generative AI is dependent on the platform, offering conceptual insights into the structural assumptions of the TAM and practical guidance for platform-specific AI integration policies in higher education.
The results indicate that both prompt engineering competence and motivational identity are associated with the perceived usability of AI tools (PUAI), which in turn predicts BI, suggesting that perceived usability mediated the relationships between prompt engineering competence, motivational identity, and behavioral in...
S. Alshammari, Amal Alhamazany· Education sciences· 0 citations
This research indicates the significant impact of performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, and habits on behavioral intention and the role of gender as a moderator on the relationship between facilitating conditions and behavioral intention.
Yusuf Kalınkara· Educational Academic Researc...· 0 citations
The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education raises important questions regarding their impact on student learning. Based on established technology acceptance frameworks, this study develops and empirically tests an integrative model that explains students’ attitudes t...
Golan Carmi· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
Quantitative findings highlighted that AI tools were perceived as supportive in reducing peer pressure and promoting deeper revision strategies, but concerns about irrelevant or overly generic feedback pointed to the need for developing students’ critical awareness of AI support.
Ke Liu, Hong Liu· RELC Journal : A Journal of...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.