Gated Per-Stream Manifold Restoration (G-PSMR), a training-free wrapper for a frozen policy that instantiates the framework with entropy-gated visual consensus and gated relative-orientation debiasing, which preserves the within-episode orientation trajectory.
Abstract
Vision–Language–Action (VLA) policies remain brittle under modest distribution shift. On LIBERO-Plus, contemporary models that solve clean tasks at high rates can fall below 30% success when the camera’s viewpoint or the robot’s initial pose is perturbed. Most training-free test-time remedies address this problem through the image stream, for example, by augmenting, purifying, or selecting visual observations. In our controlled evaluation, this family of methods improves mean success by only about three points and leaves the robot-initial-state failure largely unresolved. This paper studies the failure at the level of input streams. A VLA receives visual tokens, a proprioceptive state token, and language tokens; different perturbations can move different streams away from their training manifold. In particular, the robot-initial-state perturbation directly shifts the proprioceptive token; therefore, image-space interventions have limited leverage. We introduce Gated Per-Stream Manifold Restoration (G-PSMR), a training-free wrapper for a frozen policy. For each stream, a lightweight gate detects off-manifold inputs and applies a stream-specific restoration before the policy forward pass. We instantiate the framework with entropy-gated visual consensus and gated relative-orientation debiasing, which preserves the within-episode orientation trajectory. In the original 280-episode paired evaluation, the joint method improves total success by +5.3 points compared with a +3.2 image-only gain and raises the most fragile factor from 20% to 38%. On 1120 previously unevaluated, manifest-disjoint task instances, the state restoration improves robot-initial-state success from 23.8% to 28.7%; a separate prospectively specified confirmation on 600 new gate-active instances yields 26.3%→32.2% (+5.8 points; 95% CI [+3.2,+8.5]; p<0.001). Together, the original cross-stream results and two independent state-stream evaluations support the central principle of matching the restoration to the input stream carrying the shift.
CorrectVLA is presented, a framework that translates task-level natural language corrections into additive action magnitude adjustments without modifying policy weights, and succeeds when policies possess strategic correctness and fails when fundamental comprehension is absent, establishing a practical operational boun...
O. Kwon, Pablo Ortega-Kral, A. Bucker et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language-action (VLA) models generalize broadly across robotic manipulation tasks, but complex environments require balancing task success with unintended contact. Runtime shields can correct individual actions, but they leave the underlying policy unchanged, so repeated disagreements may create a persistent pol...
M.-Y. Cui, Zhe-Yuan Liu, Yi-Han Zhu et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language-action models let robots follow language instructions, but their language backbones of several billion parameters are the main obstacle to running them on robot hardware, and removing 63% of it from OpenVLA-OFT drops LIBERO-Long success from 93.2% to 0.8%.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models with billions of parameters now dominate the LIBERO manipulation benchmark, but the model capacity actually required by the benchmark remains unclear. We introduce MINERVA (MINimal Efficient Robotic Vision-Action policy), a family of deliberately compact visuomotor policies designed...
Kohei Sendai, T. Matsushima, Yusuke Iwasawa· 3 citations· ⚡1
Large-scale vision-language-action (VLA) models provide powerful priors for robot manipulation, yet adapting them to a specific deployment remains challenging. Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on task-specific demonstrations provides a step toward deployment, but faces two persistent limitations: static data provide limite...
Zimu Han, Yi-Ming Zeng, Ji-Yao Zhang et al.· 0 citations
A vision--language--action (VLA) policy can complete complex tasks while ignoring the evidence that should determine its actions. An object held near the wrist camera can displace the instructed target. Language and action show the same pattern: a familiar noun can trigger the operation it was paired with in training e...
Ming-Yu Liu, Chong-Hao Sima, Tianjian Feng et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.