The bounds on the number of Eulerian orientations for certain classes of connected, loopless $4-regular graphs are improved and a divide-and-conquer algorithm is provided that leverages structural properties to compute the exact number of Eulerian orientations for separable graphs without exhaustive enumeration.
Abstract
An Eulerian orientation of a $4$-regular undirected graph (simple or multigraph) $G=(V,E)$ with $n=|V|$ vertices is an assignment of directions to its edges such that every vertex $v \in V$ has the same indegree and outdegree. In the present article, we improve the bounds on the number of Eulerian orientations for certain classes of connected, loopless $4$-regular graphs. The previous bound is due to M. Las Vergnas (1983) and is exactly $9\cdot 2^{n-3}$, which is a sharp bound for a certain family of multigraphs with $n\geq 4$. Here, we show that the number of Eulerian orientations for all biconnected $4$-regular multigraphs is at most $2^n+2$, which is also sharp. We exhibit families of graphs that attain this maximum value. For simple graphs, we prove an upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(3^{n/2})$ in the biconnected case and $\mathcal{O}(6^{n/3})$ for the separable case. Additionally, we provide a divide-and-conquer algorithm that leverages structural properties to compute the exact number of Eulerian orientations for separable graphs without exhaustive enumeration. Finally, we analyze the effect of standard inductive construction operations, used to generate $4$-regular graphs from smaller ones, as shown by F.Bories et.al. (1983) for simple graphs and by G.Ding et.al. (2003) for multigraphs, on the number of Eulerian orientations.
A finite connected graph is rarely a Cayley graph. We measure how far it is from being one: given $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, how few edges must be added, or added and deleted, before the result is a Cayley graph of an abelian group of order $n$ on the same vertex set? This defines two invariants, the completi...
A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a connected mutual-visibility set if every two vertices of $S$ are joined by a shortest path whose internal vertices lie outside $S$, and the subgraph induced by $S$ is connected. We introduce the connected mutual-visibility number $\mu_c(G)$, defined as the maximum cardinality o...
Let $G$ be an undirected unweighted planar graph and let $S=(s_0,\dots,s_{k-1})$ be the vertices of a designated face, listed in cyclic order. Consider a vector that stores the distances from an arbitrary vertex $v$ to all vertices of $S$. The pattern of $v$ is obtained by taking the difference between every pair of co...
Viktor Fredslund-Hansen, S. Mozes, Oren Weimann· 0 citations
A graph $G=(V,E)$ is called $d$-rigid if, for a generic embedding of its vertices in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the only continuous motions of the vertices preserving the distances between all pairs of adjacent vertices are those induced from the isometries of $\mathbb{R}^d$ (that is, translations and rotations of the whole graph...
Michael Krivelevich, Alan Lew, Peleg Michaeli· 0 citations
Let $G$ be a graph together with a total order $\prec$ on its edges. We say that $\prec$ is realizable in $\mathbb{R}^d$ if there is a placement of the vertices of $G$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that the Euclidean lengths of the edges induce exactly the order $\prec$. Almendra-Hern\'andez and Mart\'inez-Sandoval proved tha...
Gerardo L. Maldonado, Leonardo Martínez-Sandoval, Miguel Raggi et al.· 0 citations
Let $G$ be a $3$-partite graph with $k$ vertices in each part such that the bipartite graph induced by any two parts contains no cycle of length four. Fischer and Matou\v{s}ek [J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 2001] asked for the maximum number of triangles in such a graph. They obtained the lower bound $(1-o(1))k^{3/2}$ and...
Chun-Qiu Fang, Rong-Xing Xu· 1 citation
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026