It is argued that instruction-following evaluation should be text-indispensable: multiple actions should be visually and physically plausible, while only one should be consistent with the language instruction.
Abstract
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have made general-purpose robot manipulation increasingly plausible by conditioning robot actions on natural-language instructions. A key test of such generality is whether policies actually follow language instructions. Yet many manipulation benchmarks leave this ability underdetermined: the intended object or destination is often visually salient or uniquely feasible, allowing policies to succeed without grounding the instruction. We argue that instruction-following evaluation should be text-indispensable: multiple actions should be visually and physically plausible, while only one should be consistent with the language instruction. We introduce InstructMove, a text-indispensable benchmark for instruction-following manipulation. InstructMove instantiates this principle in pick-and-place scenes with semantic distractors, decomposing instruction following into category identification, attribute discrimination, spatial reasoning, and compositional pick-and-place. InstructMove supports a train-eval protocol with InstructMove training data and held-out evaluation tasks, with additional diagnostics for language dependence. Experiments with representative VLA policies show that InstructMove provides a controlled testbed for diagnosing visual shortcuts and that InstructMove simulation data can improve real-world instruction-following manipulation performance. Code: https://github.com/HorizonRobotics/RoboOrchardSim
This work introduces RoboFollow, a diagnostic benchmark with three principles, which exposes genuine instruction following as a critical, overlooked bottleneck in embodied agents' ability to follow instructions.
Chang Guo, Yu-Kun Xie, Bo-Han Tan et al.· 0 citations
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown strong capabilities in robotic manipulation, yet existing benchmarks typically assume that task-relevant information is explicitly specified in the instruction. In practice, however, humans frequently refer to objects, quantities, and relations implicitly, requiring robots...
Aernaer Akelijiang, Jian-Nan Li, Zhi-Neng Chen et al.· 0 citations
The real-robot benchmark demonstrates that StellaVLA can use both human/robot demos and human-to-robot (XR) demos as in-context structured demonstration to help VLA model adapt to OOD tasks.
Siyu Xu, Yun-Ke Wang, Zi-Jian Wang et al.· 3 citations
This work develops PROBE, a framework for benchmarking and finetuning VLM agents on cluttered tabletop scenes, and designs PROBE-Agent, a finetuning recipe to distill successful trajectories from a powerful teacher foundation model to a smaller open-weight model using a mixed data recipe that encourages manipulation-ef...
Vineet Bhat, Si-Yi Chen, Alex Zook et al.· 0 citations
This paper argues that what a VLA needs is not the ability to generate language, but the ability to consume grounded language, and introduces a framework that endows a VLA with language competence through in-context post-training and an agentic tool-use interface.
Jia-Rui Yang, Wen Huang, Jia-Le Zhang et al.· 1 citation
Evidence Acquisition and Feasibility Gating (EAFG) is proposed, a framework that acquires visual evidence through VLM-generated exploratory subgoals and TAMP-based execution and applies a feasibility gate to decide whether to proceed with task planning, acquire further evidence, or halt.
Tsunehiko Tanaka, Matthew Stephenson, Alistair Macvicar et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.