Sep 2026· Journal of Global Social Transformation· Vol 2, pp. 183-199· 0 citations· 9 references
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
TL;DR
The framework provides an analytical characterization of a mechanism that can generate the lower-price coordination outcome reported in recent computational research, clarifying conditions under which multidimensional coordination can be associated with consumer-beneficial rather than purely anticompetitive outcomes.
Abstract
This paper develops a continuous-time differential game to examine how artificial intelligence shapes strategic pricing and advertising competition among e-commerce sellers. Building on recent reinforcement-learning evidence of counterintuitive lower-price outcomes under consumer search responsiveness, the analysis incorporates AI capability through demand sensitivity and advertising effectiveness within a Nerlove-Arrow (1962) goodwill framework. A closed-form coordination-reversal condition is derived in a static-goodwill benchmark, showing that coordinated equilibrium prices fall below non-cooperative Nash equilibrium prices if and only if the advertising-spillover effect dominates the cross-price substitution effect. The mechanism is then embedded in a continuous-time differential game with endogenous goodwill, and the feedback Nash equilibrium conditions are formulated through a coupled Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman system. In the static benchmark, higher AI capability is shown to expand the parameter region supporting lower prices under coordination through the advertising-effectiveness channel. Welfare analysis reveals that lower prices do not automatically guarantee higher consumer surplus when advertising and goodwill adjust; the exact demand condition for consumer-surplus improvement is derived. The framework provides an analytical characterization of a mechanism that can generate the lower-price coordination outcome reported in recent computational research, clarifying conditions under which multidimensional coordination can be associated with consumer-beneficial rather than purely anticompetitive outcomes.
This paper studies the algorithmic design of price competition in oligopolistic markets, with a focus on long-run market dynamics under reference price effects. We consider a sequential price competition framework with multiple sellers operating over a finite horizon, each lacking prior knowledge of the demand functi...
Yong-Ge Yang, Jian-Nan Ke, Cong Shi· Production and operations ma...· 0 citations
In this paper we construct a dynamic entry deterrence game in which market demand follows the Chan-Karolyi-Longstaff-Sanders (CKLS) stochastic differential equation (SDE). The incumbent firm, whose true strength is privately known, uses advertising and promotional expenditures strategically to shape the entrant’s belie...
M. Issah, Paramahansa Pramanik· SN Business & Economics· 1 citation
We study strategic trading around index reconstitution in a continuous-time, multiasset game with transient cross-asset price impact and heterogeneous beliefs about future index membership. Opportunistic traders position before a public announcement, adjust to the revealed composition, and trade around an indexer follo...
Lukas-Benedikt Fiechtner, José H. Blanchet· 0 citations
E-commerce platforms involve interactions among platform governance, manufacturer pricing, consumer perception, and managerial cognition. This study examines how platform overconfidence and consumer product-fit perception accuracy affect pricing, profitability, and operational mode selection. Product-fit perception acc...
Bo Xie, Xu-Yang Gao, Qi-Qi Guo et al.· Systems· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.