The relationship between AI anxiety and work engagement among early childhood teachers: a moderated mediation model of job crafting and perceived organizational support
A moderated mediation model constructed to examine the association between AI anxiety and work engagement among early childhood teachers, as well as the roles of job crafting and perceived organizational support indicated that AI anxiety was negatively associated with work engagement among early childhood teachers.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been deeply integrated into early childhood education, the technological transformation has brought both opportunities and adaptive pressure to early childhood teachers. AI anxiety has accordingly become a prominent factor impacting teachers’ work engagement. Based on the conservation of resources theory, this study constructed a moderated mediation model to examine the association between AI anxiety and work engagement among early childhood teachers, as well as the roles of job crafting and perceived organizational support. Questionnaires were distributed to 933 early childhood teachers, and the collected data were analyzed to verify the proposed model. The results indicated that AI anxiety was negatively associated with work engagement among early childhood teachers. Job crafting mediated the link between AI anxiety and work engagement, while perceived organizational support moderated the relationship between AI anxiety and job crafting. Promoting early childhood teachers’ work engagement requires the mitigation of AI anxiety, the strengthening of perceived organizational support, and the cultivation of job crafting. This study provides empirical evidence and practical implications for alleviating AI anxiety and enhancing work engagement among early childhood teachers.
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into university teaching, research, and administration. However, it remains unclear whether and how AI readiness, as an AI-specific personal resource, is associated with broader innovative work behavior beyond AI adoption or explicitly AI-enhanc...
Li Fu, Jian-Bing Yan· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
Findings extend the JD‐R model to AI‐supported higher education and highlight the importance of institutional support, AI literacy development, and psychological resource building in enhancing teachers' engagement.
Xin-Xing Wu· European Journal of Educatio...· 1 citation
This study examined the association between distributed leadership and teachers’ work engagement, with teacher subjective well-being specified as a mediator and perceived collective teacher efficacy as a moderator.
Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources model and social cognitive theory, a moderated mediation...
Müslim Alanoğlu, Rebin Salih Khudhur, Zulfu Demirtas et al.· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
Generative AI is increasingly embedded in knowledge work, yet employees may interpret the same technology either as a resource that extends their capabilities or as a threat involving replacement or monitoring. The psychological pathways linking this interpretation to job engagement and job embeddedness remain underexp...
Employee innovative behavior is an important micro-level source of organizational competitiveness. Grounded in conservation of resources (COR) theory, with the job demands–resources (JD–R) model specifying the complementary motivational process, this study examines how PsyCap is associated with innovative behavior and...
AI anxiety may constitute a psychological barrier to students’ motivational adaptation to AI-supported learning and it is suggested that AI literacy education should integrate emotion-regulation and metacognitive support with differentiated learning assistance.