SPARK is introduced, a two-stage framework for targeted KV-memory repair that reduces multimodal attack success while preserving general capability and suggests that multimodal jailbreak behavior can be substantially mitigated by selectively repairing intervention-relevant KV subspaces at prefill.
Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreaks that distribute harmful intent across text and images, making unimodal safety mechanisms insufficient. We investigate whether this vulnerability can be mitigated directly in the multimodal key-value (KV) memory formed during prefill, without modifying model parameters at inference time. We introduce SPARK, a two-stage framework for targeted KV-memory repair. Stage 1 uses a disposable diagnostic adapter to identify harm-associated directions in multimodal key and value representations. Stage 2 projects out these directions, learns a lightweight residual repair, and anchors repaired keys with an image-structural prior to preserve visual grounding. Rather than applying the intervention uniformly, SPARK mixes repaired and original memory using a head-wise coefficient g_h* determined by intervention-relevant subspace energy E_h, requiring no explicit harm classifier at inference. Across LLaVA-OneVision-7B, Chameleon-7B, Qwen2-VL-7B, and InternVL2-4B, SPARK reduces multimodal attack success while preserving general capability. On LLaVA-OneVision-7B, image-only jailbreak attack success falls to 4.7%, while MMMU remains within 0.6 points of the undefended model (47.8 vs. 48.4) with near-baseline language quality. On MM-SafetyBench, attack success decreases from 39.2% to 12.4%. Even under white-box adaptive joint prompt-image attacks, attack success is limited to 20.3%, compared with 54.6% for the undefended model. These results suggest that multimodal jailbreak behavior can be substantially mitigated by selectively repairing intervention-relevant KV subspaces at prefill, particularly when harmful evidence is carried by the visual modality.
It is suggested that multimodal safety cannot be enforced reliably without modeling the requested operation, the visual target to which it applies, and the confidence of that grounding.
A causal, neuron-level analysis of safety mechanisms in 10 VLMs, a two-stage detection pipeline with iterative ablation that accounts for self-repair, and two modality-isolated benchmarks, ViSafe-Detect and ViSafe-Eval, which decouple visual and textual safety signals are introduced.
Jia-Xuan Li, Jia-Hao Zhang, D. Vo et al.· 0 citations
It is found that post-pretraining QK-RMSNorm injection fails to reproduce the protection of native QK-RMSNorm, while several off-the-shelf weight-merging settings fail to recover the lost capability after VL training, highlighting the value of screening backbones with Sink Strength before VL training and narrow the int...
Minsik Choi, Geewook Kim, Young Geun Kim· 0 citations
VisCache is proposed, a plug-and-play framework for coarse-to-fine KV pruning without training that consistently outperforms existing baselines, establishing a new Pareto frontier between efficiency and performance for long-context VLLM inference.
Endpoint coordinate triage is therefore a useful circuit prior, but occlusion recovery requires a separate benchmark, using object-mask endpoint replacement for recovery and clean-input flooring for depth localization.
Compared to prior CLIP-enhancement methods, MLLMCLIP achieves state-of-the-art compositional accuracy while delivering consistent gains on standard zero-shot classification and image-text retrieval, showing that feature-level distillation strengthens both compositional and general vision-language representation capabil...
Jongsuk Kim, Qiyu Wu, Zhuoyuan Mao et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.