Konstruksi Ideologi Muhammadiyah: Telaah Filosofis Muqaddimah Ad/ Art, Tujuh Falsafah, Tujuh Belas Kelompok Ayat, Dan Kepribadian Muhammadiyah Dalam Bingkai Kaderisasi Islam Berkemajuan
2026· Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan· 0 citations
Abstract
This study examines the construction of Muhammadiyah ideology through an integrative philosophical analysis of its five constitutive pillars: the theological-philosophical foundations, the Muqaddimah of the Articles of Association (AD/ART), the seven philosophies (Tujuh Falsafah) of KH Ahmad Dahlan, the seventeen Quranic verse clusters (Tujuh Belas Kelompok Ayat), and the Personality of Muhammadiyah (Kepribadian Muhammadiyah). Employing a qualitative library-research approach grounded in philosophical hermeneutics, this study analyses official Muhammadiyah documents and contemporary scholarly literature. The findings demonstrate that Muhammadiyah ideology is structured along three interlocking axes: an ontological axis anchored in tawhid, a normative axis articulated in the Muqaddimah and AD/ART, and an axiological axis crystallised in the philosophies, verse clusters, and Personality. The seventeen verse clusters function as the spiritual-pedagogical core of the system, while the Personality operationalises these values into a corporate ethos of progressive Islam (Islam berkemajuan). This study contributes to the philosophy of Islamic education by offering a coherent framework for cadre formation that resists the ideological fragmentation and moral relativism of the digital era.
Muhammadiyah has long stood as one of the most influential Islamic organizations in Indonesia. Since its founding in 1912, the organization has built a strong ideological identity one that finds its operational expression in five guiding principles collectively known as the 5 Khittah. These principles emerged from successive national congresses held in Palembang (1956), Ponorogo (1969), Ujung Pandang (1971), Surabaya (1978), and Denpasar (2002). This paper examines how Muhammadiyah's ideology functions in practice through the implementation of the 5 Khittah, particularly amid the challenges of contemporary life. Drawing on a qualitative library research method, the study engages with official organizational documents, academic literature, and relevant scientific articles. The findings suggest that Muhammadiyah's ideology, rooted in the Qur'an and Sunnah, manifests through a tajdid spirit that balances purification with progress. Rather than remaining mere declarations, the five khittah serve as living guidelines that drive concrete social programs in education, health, and community welfare. At the same time, the pull of partisan politics, the pressures of globalization, and the weakening of ideological understanding among younger members present challenges that cannot be overlooked. Strengthening cadre formation, harnessing digital media for outreach, and embedding khittah values more deeply into organizational culture are essential for Muhammadiyah to remain steadfast in its mission.
M. Maimunah, Eny, Pusparini et al.· Paradigma· 0 citations
This study examines Muhammadiyah’s Manhaj Tarjih as a methodological framework for reconstructing Islamic legal reasoning in Indonesia. The study aims to analyze its foundational perspective, legal sources, epistemological approaches, technical procedures, and institutional transformation in producing religious rulings. This study uses qualitative library research with descriptive-analytical methods. The data were collected from official Muhammadiyah documents, academic books, journal articles, theses, and relevant institutional publications. The findings show that Manhaj Tarjih places the Qur’an and al-Sunnah al-Maqbulah as the main normative sources, while ijma’, qiyas, maqashid al-shari‘ah, maslahah, opinions of jurists, and empirical realities function as supporting methodological instruments. Legal rulings are formulated through collective ijtihad that integrates bayani, burhani, and irfani approaches. This collective mechanism produces legal reasoning that is hierarchical, argumentative, integrative, and adaptive to social change. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated reading of Manhaj Tarjih as a theoretical and operational framework that connects tajdid, Islam Berkemajuan, legal sources, epistemology, and collective ijtihad. Thus, Manhaj Tarjih represents a modern model of Islamic legal reasoning that balances text, reason, spirituality, and public benefit. This model remains relevant for contemporary Islamic legal thought and Islamic education
Rahmatul Husniah, Putri Desi Natalia, Siti Asisah et al.· Jurnal Penelitian dan Evalua...· 0 citations
The reconstruction of Manhaj Tarjih demonstrates a methodological shift toward the integration of bayani, burhani, and maqasidi approaches, enabling Islamic knowledge to engage constructively with contemporary digital challenges.
Ismegawati, Kailani, Devi et al.· Paradigma· 0 citations
Changes in social structure, rising economic participation of women, and the growing intellectual capacity of wives have produced the phenomena of wives' role dominance and husbands' domestification, reviving debates over the position of qiwamah in Islamic family law. This study analyzes the construction of qiwamah across the Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi'i, and Hanbali schools, examines the normative status of wives' role dominance and husbands' domestification, and explores whether fadl and financial maintenance function as the illah or merely the hikmah of qiwamah, along with their implications for contemporary Muslim family leadership. This qualitative library research uses a normative approach, drawing on classical fiqh texts across the four madhhabs, Qur'anic exegesis, scientific journals, and official statistical reports, analyzed through comparative, ushul fiqh, and socio-normative approaches. The findings show that all four madhhabs converge on understanding qiwamah as a mandate of leadership oriented toward responsibility, protection, and family welfare rather than male superiority, so a wife's economic dominance or intellectual superiority and a husband's greater domestic involvement do not automatically transfer qiwamah to the wife. Ushul fiqh analysis further shows that fadl and financial maintenance do not meet the criteria of a clear, fixed, and measurable illah, and are more appropriately positioned as the hikmah of qiwamah. This study concludes that changes in household role distribution affect only the implementation of rights and obligations, not the structure of family leadership, so the reconstruction of qiwamah should strengthen deliberation, cooperation, mutual good treatment, and shared responsibility in line with Islamic legal principles.
This research analyzes the influence of materialist–post-materialist value orientation, cultural backlash, and elite perception on the voting preferences of Muhammadiyah's young members in the transition of leadership from Joko Widodo (Jokowi) to Prabowo Subianto in the 2024 Presidential Election. Based on the cultural backlash theory by Ronald Inglehart along with Norris & Inglehart (2019), the research frames the contest as a battle of two value axes: Jokowi as a symbol of post-materialist values (openness, participation) and Prabowo as a symbol of materialist values (stability, authority, order). The research uses a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design. Data were collected from 63 members of the autonomous Muhammadiyah organization in the Special Region of Yogyakarta through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and then analyzed using multiple linear regression. The model places value orientation (X1), cultural backlash (X2), and elite perception (X3) as independent variables, and voting preference (Y) as the dependent variable. The results show that the model is significant simultaneously (F = 4.639; p = 0.0006; R2 = 0.191). However, partially, only the materialist–post-materialist value orientation has a significant influence (β = 0,436; p= 0,001), while cultural backlash (β = 0,035; p = 0,807) and elite perception (β = -0,055; p = 0,702) are not significant. These findings confirm that the political preferences of Muhammadiyah's young members are primarily driven by fundamental value orientations, rather than cultural reactions or elite influences. Cultural backlash among this group is diagnostic (awareness of threats) rather than restorative (triggering populist support). The research concludes that framing Jokowi as a post-materialist symbol and Prabowo as a materialist symbol has a clear and strong impact: the majority of post-materialist-oriented young Muhammadiyah members tend to maintain their affinity toward Jokowi's symbol and reject shifting to Prabowo's materialist symbolism.
Rivaldi Mahardika, A. Ramadhani, Hibatulloh Akbar Novianto· GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Ka...· 0 citations