This work introduces Gradient Control Rewards (GCR), an interpretable, control-inspired reward-design methodology for accelerating agent training by modulating the reward signal based on the temporal dynamics of system error, Inspired by classical control theory.
Abstract
Designing an optimal reward function is fundamental to achieving stability and efficiency in reinforcement learning (RL). This is particularly critical in robotics, where sparse rewards often provide insufficient guidance, necessitating the inclusion of auxiliary state information to facilitate meaningful exploration. This work introduces Gradient Control Rewards (GCR), an interpretable, control-inspired reward-design methodology for accelerating agent training by modulating the reward signal based on the temporal dynamics of system error. Inspired by classical control theory, GCR partitions the reward into three distinct components, state alignment, bias correction, and dynamic stability. These elements synergistically discourage the accumulation of error and excessive velocity toward objectives, facilitating the acquisition of a well-regulated action policy. GCR was evaluated across diverse environments, ranging from simple pendulum simulations to high-fidelity robotic scenarios and external physical validation. Experimental results demonstrate that GCR achieves competitive performance compared to both conventional reward functions and adaptive methods such as Bootstrapped Reward Shaping (BSRS). While alternative approaches exhibit performance degradation in stochastic, real-world-representative simulations, GCR maintains robustness and has been successfully validated in external physical environments. These findings suggest that GCR offers a practical and interpretable framework for deploying RL in control-oriented physical systems.
A unified analytical framework for comparing dynamic reward shaping and neighbouring adaptive reward mechanisms is introduced, which distinguishes parametric revision from state-dependent variation, separates additive shaping from reward replacement and reward-adjacent guidance, and organises existing methods along tem...
Three widely used RL algorithms for continuous robotic control are compared, finding that A2C exhibited highly unstable performance under energy-aware rewards on MountainCarContinuous-v0, suggesting that A2C may require additional reward shaping or tuning before use in energy-constrained robotic applications.
Om Herur· American Journal of Student...· 0 citations
This work proposes LaRes, a novel hybrid framework that achieves efficient policy learning through reward function search by leveraging large language models to generate the reward function population, guiding RL in policy learning.
Pengyi Li, Hongyao Tang, Jinbin Qiao et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 7 citations
It is concluded that a continuous shaping gradient and the exploration-noise initialization, interacting with the curriculum advancement criterion, determine convergence in continuous control deep reinforcement learning, and that reward polarity by itself does not.
A. Alkhodre, Mouhamad Alim Al-Amine, Yazed Alsaawy· Drones· 0 citations
MeRLa (Meta-Learned Reward Shaping), a principled framework that meta-learns a task-aware shaping function across auxiliary tasks before RLHF training, is introduced, providing theoretical guarantees for policy invariance, analyze representation drift sensitivity, and formally address incentive misalignment from entrop...
A unified view of ARD in RL is provided by introducing a taxonomy, organized by the primary driver of the reward variation, that distinguishes external-feedback-driven reward updates from reward adaptations driven by endogenous within-run signals and those conditioned on exogenous context signals.
Raphaela Baybas, Carlo D'Eramo, Philipp Brune· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.