Skip to content

From the Digital Divide to Digital Equity: Building Local Government Capacity

Sep 2026 · Information Systems Journal · 0 citations · 16 references

TL;DR

This work examines how Clayton County, Georgia, United States, established an Office of Digital Equity (ODE), led by a dedicated Digital Equity Administrator (DEA), as a local government division, and shows how dedicated organisational structures can help local governments move from addressing the digital divide to sustaining digital equity.

Abstract

More than 2.5 billion people worldwide still lack internet access, while many others lack the devices, skills or support needed to benefit from digital services. This digital inequity has significant implications for health, education and employment. Closing the digital divide requires more than broadband infrastructure and isolated digital inclusion programmes. It also requires local governments to coordinate resources, actors and services over time. We examine how Clayton County, Georgia, United States, established an Office of Digital Equity (ODE), led by a dedicated Digital Equity Administrator (DEA), as a local government division. The ODE was the first county‐run Office of Digital Equity in Georgia and has received external recognition for its work. Drawing on a collaborative autoethnographic case grounded in longitudinal practitioner experience, narrative accounts, organisational artefacts and public records, we examine how local government capacity for digital equity is built in practice. We derive five recommendations for municipal leaders: secure political legitimacy while preserving operational autonomy; develop the DEA role; build partnerships to address resource constraints; tailor outreach and provide consistent training and events; and use data‐driven insights to guide decisions. These recommendations show that institutionalising digital equity through a dedicated local government division differs from operating standalone initiatives or coalitions because it requires sustained authority, coordination and accountability. We position digital equity as an ongoing local governance challenge and show how dedicated organisational structures can help local governments move from addressing the digital divide to sustaining digital equity.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Digital Inclusion in Public Services: Challenges, Barriers and Strategies for Equitable Digital Administration

This paper analyses the phenomenon of digital inclusion in public services, starting from the observation that the accelerated digitalisation of public administrations risks deepening pre-existing social inequalities. Drawing on the framework of the digital divide with its three levels — access, skills and outcomes — i...

D. Apateanu · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Digital Inequality and Digital Oppression: Mapping the Divide, Its Mechanisms, and Pathways to Equity

It is argued that the digital divide is not a natural or temporary phenomenon of uneven technological diffusion, but a result of political and economic decisions and choices, and that closing the divide will require conscious investments in infrastructure, skills, inclusive design, and regulatory accountability.

Nurul Islam, C. Dinu · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Re-evaluating the Digital Transformation of Local Government Institutions to Build SMART Local Governance in Bangladesh: A Study on Municipalities

This article examines the ongoing efforts and challenges of digitising local government institutions in Bangladesh, focusing specifically on Paurashava (municipalities), and proposes an integrated framework for enhancing the capacities of municipalities.

Md. Rakibul Islam, Md. Shofiul Alam, Waseq Billah et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Digital government, circular economy, and public value creation: orga-nizational factors in the adoption of digital technologies in the Federal District (Brazil) and New York State (United States)

The findings show that digital technologies contribute to transparency and information integration, but their capacity to generate public value—such as policy coherence, effectiveness, and sustainability—is fundamentally mediated by organizational capacity, coordination mechanisms, and institutional stability.

Júlio Cezar Costa Ramos, Eduardo Augusto Terra Rossi DE Barros, Luiz Henrique Melo Pires · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

The Influence of the Digital Divide on External Political Efficacy: An Empirical Study from Khon Kaen, Thailand

Digital inequalities pose a threat to democratic participation, especially at the local level where citizen–government interactions are most direct. This study examines how multidimensional digital inequalities influence external political efficacy— citizens’ perceptions of government responsiveness in Khon Kaen Munici...

Kasipat Thonmanee Kasipat Thonmanee · 0 citations
#diffusion models Open access Sep 2026

From the “death of distance” to digitalisation traps: a general purpose technology perspective on peripheral regions

Digitalisation is widely viewed as an enabler of sustainable development and regional convergence, yet substantial spatial disparities in uptake persist. This paper develops a general-purpose technology (GPT) perspective on peripheral regions, arguing that because digital technologies rely on complementary assets (sk...

Theo Lynn, C. O'Gorman, P. Rosati et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.