A Bayesian phase II adaptive platform design for regimen optimization that integrates pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling into toxicity, efficacy, regimen selection and adaptation decisions is developed.
Abstract
Early-phase dose-finding methods increasingly assess toxicity and efficacy jointly, but comparisons based only on administered dose may inadequately characterize regimens differing in schedule. We developed a Bayesian phase II adaptive platform design for regimen optimization that integrates pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling into toxicity, efficacy, regimen selection and adaptation decisions. The proposed PK/PD-informed Regimen Optimization Platform (PROP) design uses a population PK/PD model to generate patient- and population-level predictions of exposure and biological activity. Acute and cumulative toxicities are analysed using a discrete-time time-to-event model informed by PK exposure. Efficacy is evaluated through Bayesian model averaging of exposure-driven and biomarker-driven time-to-event models. The design supports regimen graduation, discontinuation for futility or safety, and addition of unexplored regimens. Performance was evaluated through simulations motivated by an influenza intensive-care setting. Across six scenarios, PROP generally improved graduation and futility decisions, reduced inappropriate graduation, and supported the addition of promising regimens compared with dose-based alternatives. It also more accurately estimated regimen-specific toxicity and arm-specific efficacy, while the model-averaging framework favored the efficacy model consistent with the data-generating mechanism. Dose-based approaches performed better for safety stopping in some scenarios, despite less accurate characterization of the regimen--toxicity relationship. PK/PD-informed platform designs can improve adaptive regimen selection and knowledge generation when dose alone cannot adequately characterize treatment regimens.
CR-EffTox is proposed, a Bayesian adaptive phase I/II trial design that jointly models time-to-event DLT and DP using cause-specific hazard functions and generally outperforms methods that ignore competing risks or information borrowing, substantially improving correct selection probability and enhancing patient safety...
The primary goal of a two-stage Phase I/II trial is to identify the optimal dose for the following large-scale Phase III trial. Conventional Phase I designs focus on the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), assuming that efficacy increases monotonically with dose. However, this assumption may not hold for novel therapies such...
Hao Sun, Jerry Li· Journal of Biopharmaceutical...· 0 citations
Conventional dose selection in oncology, which focuses on the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), has certain limitations for targeted agents and immunotherapies, where the efficacy-toxicity relationship may not be monotonic. Regulatory initiatives such as FDA's Project Optimus highlight the need for improved dose optimizati...
The FDA's Project Optimus CALLS for randomized exploration of multiple doses to better refine selection of the optimal biologic dose (OBD). Project FrontRunner encourages the use of randomized controlled trials earlier in the drug development process. We propose a seamless three-stage trial design that addresses both g...
Emily C. Zabor, Sneha Govande, Wen-Wee Ma et al.· Pharmaceutical statistics· 0 citations
A novel benefit–risk assessment framework for DO in early‐phase oncology trials, utilizing hierarchical composite endpoints (HCEs), which extends the HCE method to incorporate pharmacokinetic data through a probabilistic index model, allowing drug exposure to support dose selection.
Yu-Xiang Wu, Xiao-Han Guo, Ray Li et al.· Pharmaceutical statistics· 0 citations
Background Adaptive Phase I/II designs can jointly use toxicity and efficacy information to guide dose allocation and regimen selection. These designs are particularly relevant for oncology drug-combination trials, where the optimal regimen may not coincide with the maximum tolerated dose. Methods We conducted a struct...
Jun-Ying Wang, Song Wu, Jie Yang· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.