TempoWAM (Timing Execution by Monitoring Progress Online), a lightweight plug-and-play execution scheme for WAMs, calibrated by a task-dependent calibration factor with online adaptation to bridge the training-deployment gap.
Abstract
World Action Models (WAMs) jointly predict future actions and the evolution of the environment. At each inference, a WAM generates a chunk of actions and the robot executes a fixed prefix before replanning. We argue that this fixed execution horizon is poorly matched to execution dynamics: the chunk reliability varies across task stages, so when to replan depends on the result of accumulated execution, not on the step counts. We propose TempoWAM (Timing Execution by Monitoring Progress Online), a lightweight plug-and-play execution scheme for WAMs. A Recurrent Progress Monitor first estimates task progress from the current observation, task instruction, remaining actions, and execution history; and an Adaptive Execution Protocol then evaluates whether the chunk is advancing the task to decide if replanning is needed. To bridge the training-deployment gap, the protocol is calibrated by a task-dependent calibration factor with online adaptation. Experiments on LIBERO, RoboTwin, and real-world tasks show that TempoWAM consistently improves the efficiency-success trade-off of WAM execution. On real robots, it reduces WAM inferences by 26.9% on easy tasks while maintaining success, and improves success by 13.3 points on difficult tasks.
World action models (WAMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for robotic manipulation. They act by first predicting how a task should be performed and then decoding the actions from that future. However, the remaining actions are invalid once execution drifts from the prediction. Simply replanning from the already o...
World action models (WAMs) that use future visual prediction at inference time incur substantial generation costs. Asynchronous execution reduces waiting by overlapping inference with robot motion, but visual predictions used for subsequent action generation must anticipate the effects of actions already scheduled for...
Xu-Yao Huang, Yi-Xuan Wang, Zeng-Yao Ye et al.· 1 citation
Robot foundation policies predict action chunks, but how many actions to execute before replanning depends on the current task phase. We introduce ChunkTrust, which treats the execution horizon as a latent variable inferred from action-expert evidence rather than a fixed hyperparameter. Its training-free Action-aware H...
Fan-Ding Huang, Jing-Yan Jiang, Shi-Feng Bao et al.· 0 citations
STAIRCASE POLICY is introduced, a streaming inference and training framework that turns a flow-matching VLA into a JEPA-style WAM and partitions a large action chunk into sub-chunks at staggered denoising stages, enabling long-horizon execution without repeated full policy inference.
Guoheng Sun, Chen Chen, Jin Wang et al.· 0 citations
Action-chunking policies predict multi-step control sequences, but a fundamental question remains: how much of a predicted action chunk should be committed before replanning? Existing systems typically execute a fixed-length prefix, implicitly assuming that the same execution horizon remains trustworthy across states....
Yu-Yan Li, Yu-Jian Wang, Yu-Song Huang et al.· 0 citations
World action models (WAMs) condition robot actions on predicted futures, but iterative video rollout increases deployment latency. We ask whether action generation requires the evolving rollout trajectory or only its future representation. Across four WAMs on 40 simulated robotic manipulation tasks, paired closed-loop...
Chu-Shan Zhang, Jin-Guang Tong, Xue-Song Li et al.· 3 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.